Re: [riot-devel] 6lowpan is not answering address ff02::2

[Baptiste Clenet]

Don't have time to try new ND. BTW, great work martine, I hope to see
it merge soon.
I used border router and gnrc_networking to make everything works as expected

2017-09-04 23:11 GMT+02:00 Martine Lenders :
> Hi,
>
> can you try with the new neighbor discovery? [1]
>
> Cheers,
> Martine
>
> [1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/7479
>
> 2017-09-04 20:09 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Clenet :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've flashed gnrc_networking on two samr21-xpro. I've noticed that
>> they do not answer to router solicitation because "packet destination
>> is not this host" when source address is ff02::2 (gnrc_ipv6.c)[1].
>> On native, there is no problem.
>> By going deeper, I saw that the address ff02::2 is not added to the
>> interface because samr21-xpro uses sixlowpan (compare to native), the
>> function in question is [2]
>>
>> So basically, when the first samr21-xpro send a router solicitation,
>> nobody answers. Shouldn't the second samr21-xpro answer? What do you
>> think?
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/gnrc/network_layer/ipv6/gnrc_ipv6.c#L905
>> [2]
>> https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/gnrc/network_layer/ipv6/netif/gnrc_ipv6_netif.c#L268
>> --
>> Baptiste
>> ___
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@riot-os.org
>> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



-- 
Baptiste
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] 6lowpan is not answering address ff02::2

[Martine Lenders]

Hi,

can you try with the new neighbor discovery? [1]

Cheers,
Martine

[1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/7479

2017-09-04 20:09 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Clenet :

> Hi,
>
> I've flashed gnrc_networking on two samr21-xpro. I've noticed that
> they do not answer to router solicitation because "packet destination
> is not this host" when source address is ff02::2 (gnrc_ipv6.c)[1].
> On native, there is no problem.
> By going deeper, I saw that the address ff02::2 is not added to the
> interface because samr21-xpro uses sixlowpan (compare to native), the
> function in question is [2]
>
> So basically, when the first samr21-xpro send a router solicitation,
> nobody answers. Shouldn't the second samr21-xpro answer? What do you
> think?
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/gnrc/
> network_layer/ipv6/gnrc_ipv6.c#L905
> [2] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/blob/master/sys/net/gnrc/
> network_layer/ipv6/netif/gnrc_ipv6_netif.c#L268
> --
> Baptiste
> ___
> devel mailing list
> devel@riot-os.org
> https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel