Re: Compressed patch to move make/custom/* to make/*

On 08/02/18 01:00, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi The patch was quite large and rightly blocked from being sent to everyone (~900k). Compressed, it is only 63K This eliminates the custom directory and moves everything up one level.  No failures in the build as shown here.

Re: Compressed patch to move make/custom/* to make/*

On 08/02/18 09:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 08/02/18 01:00, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi The patch was quite large and rightly blocked from being sent to everyone (~900k). Compressed, it is only 63K This eliminates the custom directory and moves everything up one level.  No failures in the build

Why I could not find the file cpuopts.h in master

Did anyone find this file? Thanks!___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Compressed patch to move make/custom/* to make/*

On 09/02/2018 02:22, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Sebastian Huber > > > wrote: > On 08/02/18 16:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:05 AM, Sebastian Huber >

Re: tests using FP specifiers in prints

On 08/02/18 16:45, Joel Sherrill wrote: sp19 and tm26 are not in that list. What about them? They should be fixed now. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail :

Re: Why I could not find the file cpuopts.h in master

cpuopts.h is generated during the build process. You can find it in your build tree after you make RTEMS. On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:10 AM, talos <2486580...@qq.com> wrote: > Did anyone find this file? Thanks! > > ___ > devel mailing list >

Re: Compressed patch to move make/custom/* to make/*

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:05 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 08/02/18 09:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> >> On 08/02/18 01:00, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> The patch was quite large and rightly blocked from being sent to >>> everyone (~900k).

Re: ARM and PowerPC Shared Linkcmds Alignment Issue

On 31/01/18 21:10, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi I am debugging a paravirtualized BSP. On the ARM and PowerPC, we want to use the linkcmds.share infrastructure but both use ALIGN_WITH_INPUT for the first .data section. For these BSPs, we need the .data to be on a 4K page boundary. Why the .data

tests using FP specifiers in prints

Hi Jennifer noticed that sp19 prints %g instead of numbers now that we switched to printk for the tests. I did a quick grep and found these: testsuites$ grep -rl "%g" . ./samples/fileio/init.c ./samples/paranoia/paranoia.c ./sptests/sp19/first.c ./sptests/sp19/fptask.c ./sptests/sp19/fptest.h

Re: Compressed patch to move make/custom/* to make/*

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:05 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 08/02/18 09:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >> On 08/02/18 01:00, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> The patch was quite large and rightly blocked from being sent to >>> everyone (~900k).

Re: tests using FP specifiers in prints

On 08/02/18 16:02, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi Jennifer noticed that sp19 prints %g instead of numbers now that we switched to printk for the tests.  I did a quick grep and found these: testsuites$ grep -rl "%g" . ./samples/fileio/init.c ./samples/paranoia/paranoia.c ./sptests/sp19/first.c

Re: Compressed patch to move make/custom/* to make/*

On 08/02/18 16:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:05 AM, Sebastian Huber > wrote: On 08/02/18 09:11, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 08/02/18 01:00, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi

Re: Compressed patch to move make/custom/* to make/*

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 08/02/18 16:08, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 3:05 AM, Sebastian Huber < >> sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > ed-brains.de>> wrote: >> >>

Re: tests using FP specifiers in prints

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:13 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 08/02/18 16:02, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Jennifer noticed that sp19 prints %g instead of numbers now that >> we switched to printk for the tests. I did a quick grep and found these: >> >>