Re: error while running rtems-test with coverage

I managed to get the tests running with the following two patches . Please review them . -- vijay On 9 April 2018 at 15:28, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > On Fri, 6 Apr 2018, 02:24 Vijay Kumar Banerjee, > wrote: > >> I tried to solve the

Re: error while running rtems-test with coverage

You can use this command to send a patch to devel: git send-email LOCATION_OF_PATCH_FILE --to devel@rtems.org --cc=_EMAIL_ID It makes easier to review the patch. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > I managed to get the tests running with the

Re: [PATCH] initial

Hi, Are you using Python 3? This is an upstream package ... https://github.com/msoulier/tftpy/blob/master/tftpy/TftpServer.py and it looks to me like this has been fixed upstream so we should pull down what is there are update our versions. Chris On 11/04/2018 07:04,

Re: CTS coverage running - please review

What patches? On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:04 PM, wrote: > > I managed to get the tests running with the patches . Please review > > ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[PATCH] setting raw in get_items

From: thelunatic --- rtemstoolkit/configuration.py | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py b/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py index 10d97e5..53ad79b 100644 --- a/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py +++

[PATCH] initial

From: thelunatic --- tester/rt/tftpy/TftpServer.py | 4 ++-- tester/rt/tftpy/TftpStates.py | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/rt/tftpy/TftpServer.py b/tester/rt/tftpy/TftpServer.py index 07c2107..b6d0ada 100644 ---

Re: [PATCH] setting raw in get_items

I was using Python 3, I just checked that it works fine with Python2.7 without the changes mentioned in the patch. On 11 April 2018 at 06:20, Chris Johns wrote: > On 11/04/2018 07:04, vijaykumar9...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: thelunatic > > > > --- >

Re: [PATCH] setting raw in get_items

On 11/04/2018 15:04, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > I was using Python 3, I just checked that it works fine with Python2.7 without > the changes mentioned in the patch. I suggest you stay with python 2.7 and do not use python 3. Python 3 support is a separate issue and task and while it is

Re: [PATCH] setting raw in get_items

On 11 April 2018 at 10:45, Chris Johns wrote: > On 11/04/2018 15:04, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > I was using Python 3, I just checked that it works fine with Python2.7 > without > > the changes mentioned in the patch. > > I suggest you stay with python 2.7 and do not use

[PATCH] Updated README.

--- README | 67 +- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 88a4999f20..519e8536ae 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -1,24 +1,57 @@ -This is the Real-Time Executive for Multiprocessing

Re: (should have been v2 libbsd: Make modules configurable via ini files.)

Am 10.04.2018 um 02:07 schrieb Chris Johns: > On 09/04/2018 23:58, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> Sorry, missed the subject line in git send-email. This description is to >> the v2-patch-set for the libbsd waf changes. >> >> Am 09.04.2018 um 15:53 schrieb Christian Mauderer: >>> Hello, >>> >>> this

[PATCH] configure: Add subdir-objects to all automake flags.

This option silences warning with automake-1.16.1 allowing us to upgrade to that version. This change has been tested with automake-1.12.6 and automake-1.16.1. It seems version 1.16.1 configures slower than 1.12.6 for the same source and BSP. The newer versions is 6 second slower. Close #3387.

Re: [PATCH] setting raw in get_items

On 11/04/2018 07:04, vijaykumar9...@gmail.com wrote: > From: thelunatic > > --- > rtemstoolkit/configuration.py | 4 ++-- > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py b/rtemstoolkit/configuration.py > index

Re: [PATCH] initial

yes I'm using python 3 On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 04:49 Chris Johns, wrote: > Hi, > > Are you using Python 3? > > This is an upstream package ... > > https://github.com/msoulier/tftpy/blob/master/tftpy/TftpServer.py > > and it looks to me like this has been fixed upstream so we