Re: Disable libnetwork on Epiphany?

2018-08-14 Thread Hesham Almatary
AFAIR, I've never tried epiphany with networking. The cores are supposed to be accelerators, so the ARM core can offload some processing to it. P.S. aren't we gonna make Epiphany obsolete? The discussion was raised by Sebastian before to remove Epiphany support. On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 12:20

Re: Disable libnetwork on Epiphany?

2018-08-14 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018, 2:51 AM Hesham Almatary wrote: > AFAIR, I've never tried epiphany with networking. The cores are > supposed to be accelerators, so the ARM core can offload some > processing to it. > > P.S. aren't we gonna make Epiphany obsolete? The discussion was > raised by Sebastian

Re: covoar SIGKILL Investigation

2018-08-14 Thread Chris Johns
On 15/8/18 2:47 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > There has been a thread offlist as we have been attempting to resolve > some issues that popped up using covoar at scale with Vijay's and > Chris' recent work. It appears that the magic number is 400 executables > which can be processed before

covoar SIGKILL Investigation

2018-08-14 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi There has been a thread offlist as we have been attempting to resolve some issues that popped up using covoar at scale with Vijay's and Chris' recent work. It appears that the magic number is 400 executables which can be processed before covoar dies with a SIGKILL. This should indicate that it

Re: [GSoC - x86_64] Pre-merge issues (at -O2 optimization level) and WIP review

2018-08-14 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Amaan Cheval wrote: > Hi! > > I've narrowed the issue down to this bintime function: > https://github.com/RTEMS/rtems/blob/b2de4260c5c71e518742731a8cdebe > 3411937181/cpukit/score/src/kern_tc.c#L548 > > The watchdog ticks in _Per_CPU_Information /