RE: libbsd rtems 5 branches

> -Original Message- > From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian > Huber > Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 3:22 PM > To: j...@rtems.org; rtems-de...@rtems.org > Subject: Re: libbsd rtems 5 branches > > On 07/07/2020 15:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > > > What's

[PATCH] media-server: Add ability for retry.

This adds the possibility to request a retry in the media-listener if an operation failed. Usefull for example if you want to automatically reformat a disk if it wasn't possible to mount it. --- cpukit/include/rtems/media.h | 3 +++ cpukit/libblock/src/media.c | 29 -

RE: [GSoC 2020: Daily Update]: Building EPICS with RTEMS5

> -Original Message- > From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Gedare Bloom > Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 9:45 PM > To: Mritunjay Sharma > Cc: RTEMS Devel > Subject: Re: [GSoC 2020: Daily Update]: Building EPICS with RTEMS5 > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 12:33 PM

Re: libbsd rtems 5 branches

On 09/07/2020 09:17, jan.som...@dlr.de wrote: -Original Message- From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@rtems.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Huber Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 3:22 PM To:j...@rtems.org;rtems-de...@rtems.org Subject: Re: libbsd rtems 5 branches On 07/07/2020 15:19, Joel

Re: [GSoC 2020: Daily Update]: Building EPICS with RTEMS5

Sorry for the long delay. Yes, this Epics version still uses the rtems-libbsd. The bsp must be built with --enable-network. I'm trying to create an Epics version over the weekend that recognizes from the configuration which libbsd version should be used. Viele Grüße Heinz Junkes --

[PATCH] lvgl: Update to v7.1.0

--- lv_conf.h | 337 +++-- lv_drivers | 2 +- lvgl | 2 +- lvgl.py| 3 +- 4 files changed, 281 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) diff --git a/lv_conf.h b/lv_conf.h index 7453905..9299fdc 100644 --- a/lv_conf.h +++ b/lv_conf.h @@ -1,6

GSoC 2020: Location for FreeBSD files in RTEMS

Hello, The current directory structure I have been using in my GSoC project for the FreeBSD drivers is giving me troubles while installing/including the headers. The current structure of the drivers is as follows cpukit/libfreebsd/freebsd --> After this we follow the FreeBSD file structure Eg:

[PATCH rtems-littlevgl] Allow to pass custom lv_conf.h and lv_drv_conf.h.

--- lv_conf.h => default_lv_conf.h | 0 lv_drv_conf.h => default_lv_drv_conf.h | 0 lvgl.py| 19 --- wscript| 13 + 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename lv_conf.h =>

Re: [PATCH] lvgl: Update to v7.1.0

Hi Christian, I tested the patch and it's running fine with the example applications on BBB. Thanks for the patch. Best regards, Vijay On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:34 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > > --- > lv_conf.h | 337 +++-- > lv_drivers | 2

Re: Converting stack address to shared-memory object name

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:24 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:08 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:56 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:53 AM Sebastian Huber > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > On 08/07/2020 14:43, Utkarsh Rai

make error on 5 branch?

I built/installed clean tools from rsb/5 and bootstrapped rtems/5 then: ../../rtems/configure --prefix=/home/gedare/development/rtems/5 --target=sparc-rtems5 --enable-rtemsbsp=erc32 --enable-posix --enable-tests [...] looks ok make [...] checking for RTEMS_BSP... erc32 configure: error: Invalid

Re: Converting stack address to shared-memory object name

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:08 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:56 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:53 AM Sebastian Huber >> wrote: >> > >> > On 08/07/2020 14:43, Utkarsh Rai wrote: >> > >> > > Hello, >> > > For my GSoC project, I have to provide

Re: Converting stack address to shared-memory object name

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:57 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:24 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:08 PM Utkarsh Rai > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:56 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:53 AM

Re: Converting stack address to shared-memory object name

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:46 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 8:57 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:24 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:08 PM Utkarsh Rai >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at

Re: [PATCH rtems-littlevgl] Allow to pass custom lv_conf.h and lv_drv_conf.h.

Hi, Thanks for the patch, I tested the patch and it's building fine. I just had two questions which I have inlined below. On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:13 PM Christian Mauderer wrote: > > --- > lv_conf.h => default_lv_conf.h | 0 > lv_drv_conf.h => default_lv_drv_conf.h | 0 > lvgl.py

Re: [PATCH rtems-littlevgl] Allow to pass custom lv_conf.h and lv_drv_conf.h.

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020, 12:11 AM Christian Mauderer wrote: > Hello Vijay, > > thanks for the review and the test. > > On 09/07/2020 19:58, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the patch, I tested the patch and it's building fine. I > > just had two questions which I have inlined

Re: [PATCH rtems-littlevgl] Allow to pass custom lv_conf.h and lv_drv_conf.h.

On 09/07/2020 20:52, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020, 12:11 AM Christian Mauderer > wrote: > > Hello Vijay, > > thanks for the review and the test. > > On 09/07/2020 19:58, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > > Hi, > > > >

Re: [PATCH] lvgl: Update to v7.1.0

Thanks for testing it. On 09/07/2020 17:06, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > Hi Christian, > > I tested the patch and it's running fine with the example applications > on BBB. Thanks for the patch. > > Best regards, > Vijay > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:34 PM Christian Mauderer > wrote: >> >> ---

Re: [PATCH rtems-littlevgl] Allow to pass custom lv_conf.h and lv_drv_conf.h.

Hello Vijay, thanks for the review and the test. On 09/07/2020 19:58, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the patch, I tested the patch and it's building fine. I > just had two questions which I have inlined below. > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:13 PM Christian Mauderer > wrote: >>

Re: make error on 5 branch?

It turns out there are some changes in my rtems.git/5 HEAD. I don't know how they got there. Maybe just some leftover changes while switching branches. curious, but I cleaned up the branch and things are working. I don't know if there's a way to make a warning appear for a dirty tree. just

[PATCH] Test suite for FTW.H methods

It mainly uses nftw to test as ftw also calls nftw with flag as 0 Signed-off-by: Eshan dhawan --- testsuites/psxtests/Makefile.am | 26 +++ testsuites/psxtests/configure.ac | 1 + testsuites/psxtests/psxftw01/init.c | 204 ++

[PATCH] ftw.h port for newlib

added _FTW_ENABLE_ Signed-off-by: Eshan dhawan --- newlib/configure.host | 2 +- newlib/libc/include/ftw.h | 64 ++ newlib/libc/posix/Makefile.am | 2 +- newlib/libc/posix/ftw.c | 36 newlib/libc/posix/nftw.c | 154

RTEMS Specification and Qualification Toolchain Status

Hello, in the ongoing ESA activity to produce a pre-qualified subset of RTEMS with SMP support (so called "space profile") we had the first part of the Detailed Design Review (DDR) this week. This presentation https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/sebh/rtems-smp-qual-eb-ddr-1-v2.pdf gives