Re: [PATCH] Require __getreent()

2015-11-25 Thread Daniel Gutson
Hi Sebastian, sorry for top-posting. How does the lack of this function affect current RTEMS behavior? What's the impact of not having this? We lived without this till now, how mandatory is this update? Thanks! Daniel. On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Sebastian Huber

Re: [PATCH] Require __getreent()

2015-11-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 25/11/15 14:30, Daniel Gutson wrote: How does the lack of this function affect current RTEMS behavior? Its necessary for proper interaction with Newlib. What's the impact of not having this? We lived without this till now, how mandatory is this update? I doubt, that you didn't use

Re: [PATCH] Require __getreent()

2015-11-25 Thread Marcos Díaz
Hi Sebastian we are using newlib-2.1.0, what we want to know is why is this change necessary now, why it was as before. Thanks! On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > > > On 25/11/15 14:30, Daniel Gutson wrote: > >> How does the lack of

Re: [PATCH] Require __getreent()

2015-11-25 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 25/11/15 15:32, Marcos Díaz wrote: Hi Sebastian we are using newlib-2.1.0, what we want to know is why is this change necessary now, why it was as before. Thanks! In this Newlib version the patch is included. However, its not a good idea to use an arbitrary Newlib version with the RTEMS

[PATCH] Require __getreent()

2015-11-24 Thread Sebastian Huber
This function is used by Newlib since 2013-07-09 (Git commit 9b51cd8c6b9cdd067d9648a7ab952884019c56a5). --- cpukit/configure.ac | 4 cpukit/libcsupport/src/newlibc_reent.c| 9 cpukit/sapi/include/confdefs.h| 2 +-