Please ignore this patch, it is the same patch as v1. I will create a v3.
Chris
On 17/2/20 8:58 am, chr...@rtems.org wrote:
> From: Chris Johns
>
> Update #3870
> ---
> testsuites/libtests/newlib01/init.c | 16 +++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/testsuites/libtests/newlib01/init.c
> b/testsuites/libtests/newlib01/init.c
> index 74e648799e..1bff052363 100644
> --- a/testsuites/libtests/newlib01/init.c
> +++ b/testsuites/libtests/newlib01/init.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
> #include
> #include
>
> +#include
> +
> #include "tmacros.h"
>
> const char rtems_test_name[] = "NEWLIB 1";
> @@ -63,12 +65,24 @@ static void wait(void)
> static void worker_task(rtems_task_argument arg)
> {
>test_context *ctx = _instance;
> + struct _reent *reent = __getreent();
> + FILE *output;
>char buf[1] = { 'x' };
>size_t n;
>
> - stdout = fopen(_path[0], "r+");
> + rtems_test_assert(reent->__sdidinit == 0);
> +
> + output = stdout = fopen(_path[0], "r+");
>rtems_test_assert(stdout != NULL);
>
> + /*
> + * Check newlib's __sinit does not touch our assigned file pointer.
> + */
> + rtems_test_assert(reent->__sdidinit == 0);
> + fflush(stdout);
> + rtems_test_assert(reent->__sdidinit != 0);
> + rtems_test_assert(stdout == output);
> +
>n = fwrite([0], sizeof(buf), 1, stdout);
>rtems_test_assert(n == 1);
>
>
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel