On 14/03/2018 17:53, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 13/03/18 22:45, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 13/03/2018 17:52, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 13/03/18 07:50, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/03/18 07:47, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 13/03/2018 17:18, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 13/03/18 00:49,
On 13/03/18 22:45, Chris Johns wrote:
On 13/03/2018 17:52, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/03/18 07:50, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/03/18 07:47, Chris Johns wrote:
On 13/03/2018 17:18, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/03/18 00:49, Chris Johns wrote:
Set the inode size to 256 to work around a
On 13/03/2018 17:52, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 13/03/18 07:50, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> On 13/03/18 07:47, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> On 13/03/2018 17:18, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/03/18 00:49, Chris Johns wrote:
> Set the inode size to 256 to work around a newlib scandir check where a
On 13/03/18 07:50, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/03/18 07:47, Chris Johns wrote:
On 13/03/2018 17:18, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/03/18 00:49, Chris Johns wrote:
Set the inode size to 256 to work around a newlib scandir check
where a
directory has to have a non-zero size to work. Set the size
On 13/03/18 07:47, Chris Johns wrote:
On 13/03/2018 17:18, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/03/18 00:49, Chris Johns wrote:
Set the inode size to 256 to work around a newlib scandir check where a
directory has to have a non-zero size to work. Set the size to greater than
24 bytes, a small dirent
On 13/03/18 00:49, Chris Johns wrote:
Set the inode size to 256 to work around a newlib scandir check where a
directory has to have a non-zero size to work. Set the size to greater than
24 bytes, a small dirent size so the allocator in scandir works.
The newlib scandir code should be updated to
