Please ignore this patch, it is the same patch as v1. I will create a v3. Chris
On 17/2/20 8:58 am, chr...@rtems.org wrote: > From: Chris Johns <chr...@rtems.org> > > Update #3870 > --- > testsuites/libtests/newlib01/init.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/testsuites/libtests/newlib01/init.c > b/testsuites/libtests/newlib01/init.c > index 74e648799e..1bff052363 100644 > --- a/testsuites/libtests/newlib01/init.c > +++ b/testsuites/libtests/newlib01/init.c > @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ > #include <rtems/imfs.h> > #include <rtems/libcsupport.h> > > +#include <rtems/bspIo.h> > + > #include "tmacros.h" > > const char rtems_test_name[] = "NEWLIB 1"; > @@ -63,12 +65,24 @@ static void wait(void) > static void worker_task(rtems_task_argument arg) > { > test_context *ctx = &test_instance; > + struct _reent *reent = __getreent(); > + FILE *output; > char buf[1] = { 'x' }; > size_t n; > > - stdout = fopen(&file_path[0], "r+"); > + rtems_test_assert(reent->__sdidinit == 0); > + > + output = stdout = fopen(&file_path[0], "r+"); > rtems_test_assert(stdout != NULL); > > + /* > + * Check newlib's __sinit does not touch our assigned file pointer. > + */ > + rtems_test_assert(reent->__sdidinit == 0); > + fflush(stdout); > + rtems_test_assert(reent->__sdidinit != 0); > + rtems_test_assert(stdout == output); > + > n = fwrite(&buf[0], sizeof(buf), 1, stdout); > rtems_test_assert(n == 1); > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel