Re: Bison/Yacc problems ...

2003-01-27 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:17:27PM -0500, Jamie Risk wrote: After opening the 4.2.0 tar balls and applying the 4.2.0-4.2.1 patch, I find I'm getting a compiling error when bison tries to process the file ./lib/Xft/xftgram.y. The CVS/RCS ID for the file is: $XFree86: xc/lib/Xft/xftgram.y,v

Re: xterm can hang, CPU bound

2003-02-02 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 03:42:35AM -0500, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: This is a very old bug/feature. I spent some time looking into it. Not being very experienced at X coding, so I haven't attempted a fix. Demo of bug: - in an xterm running a shell, type: echo -e '\033[?1001h' - click in

Re: http://www.xfree86.org/devel/ is gone?

2003-03-26 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 05:58:54PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 08:50:32PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: DD That is correct. Since this is a resource that contained DD information that cannot be made publicly available, it has been DD removed. Which means that we no

Re: XFree86 host.def file questions

2003-03-27 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 04:01:56PM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote: Hi Again, I think that http://www.xfree86.org/current/BUILD.html is a reasonable introduction to building XFree86, but suggestions for improving that document are most welcome. Going through the current BUILD.html

Re: XFree86 host.def file questions

2003-03-28 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 06:36:31PM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: I ususally end up searching for *** in the logs (which of course requires doing /\*\*\* in less/vi/more/etc), but I think that's an artifact of certain make implementations and not universal. standard vi won't help much, since

Re: xterm resize fails

2003-05-28 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:43:16PM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: Patch 3.62 to xc/programs/xterm/screen.c breaks xterm resizing. The call to SET_TTYSIZE no longer happens when TRACE isn't enabled. Fix is to revert to version 3.61 that sounds like a compiler optimization problem:

Re: xterm resize fails

2003-05-29 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:12:45PM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:16:08AM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: Patch 3.62 to xc/programs/xterm/screen.c breaks

Re: xterm resize fails

2003-05-29 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:20:15PM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 07:16:08AM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote

Re: xterm resize fails

2003-05-29 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:28:20PM -0400, David Dawes wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:54:57PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 05:20:15PM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2003, Thomas Dickey wrote

Re: Questions about Widgets in X window and XMoveResizeWindow

2003-08-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 02:19:26PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: dd jj wrote: Can I implement this under different desktop enviroments(KDE,GNOME) with Xlib programming? Or it's toally impossible? As my understanding, The button in Gnome is built using GTK but that in KDE is built using

Re: ansifying

2003-09-09 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Matthieu Herrb wrote: Yes. And this is a trap doing conversions semi-automatically. One need to be careful. That sort of thing is usually caught by compiler warnings. One that isn't is changing the type, e.g., int foo(x, y) char x;

Re: ansifying

2003-09-09 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Derek Fawcus wrote: On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:24:41AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote: Does the KR code go to (1) or (2)? (1) int blah(int x, float y) { ... } Hmm, given the KR promotion rules, shouldn't the above be converted to: int blah(int x, double y) { ...

Re: ansifying xwininfo.c

2003-09-09 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Warren Turkal wrote: Here is a patch ansifying xwininfo.c. I diffed the executable after the changes to the executable from before the changes, and they were the same. Index: xwininfo.c === RCS file:

Re: ansifying xwininfo.c

2003-09-09 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Warren Turkal wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: while I'm perfectly aware that extern is redundant, there are two things to be said in favor of keeping it: a) it's easy to grep for sure b) some compilers silently ignore conflicts with a static definition

Re: ansifying xwininfo.c

2003-09-09 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Matthieu Herrb wrote: ... and a 3rd reason is that 'extern' is not optional for variables. Most traditional Unix linkers will allow the same variable to be declared without 'extern' in multiple object files and merge them into only one, but this behaviour is not a feature

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 - Staying or leaving XFree86.org? [Was: Re: Cygwin/XFree86 Bugs?]

2003-10-26 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Peter Firefly Lund wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, David Dawes wrote: When I discussed this with you privately a while ago all I got were disrespectful and insulting responses. Now there is more of the same. Err... No. He was quite reasonable, in my opinion. He

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 - Staying or leaving XFree86.org? [Was: Re: Cygwin/XFree86 Bugs?]

2003-10-27 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: ...in effect that he would hold his breath turn blue. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 Bugs?

2003-10-26 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Seriously, I don't know why I waste my time submitting patches that are specific to my platform and then wait up to three weeks for them to be committed. It is a waste of my time and an insult that I am made to do well, when you graduate and

Re: new input driver for Packard Bell (UC-Logic) tablet

2003-11-21 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Alex Deucher wrote: --- Jonathan Hough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One specific question - I've based my driver on the Wacom driver, but there have been numerous changes (it wouldn't work with the Wacom tablet now). Should I change the copyright statement to my own name,

Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC1

2003-12-08 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, David Dawes wrote: My point is that for the bug reports to be useful, they need to be refreshed. That means that the reporter (or someone else with an interest in it) needs to, at a minimum, retest against new versions. When I find myself in that situation, I ask the

Re: of manpages and names

2003-12-10 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Warren Turkal wrote: I was wondering if it is possible to get manpages to be named slightly different than default without major surgery. I will illustrate what I want with an example. Say I have a manpage xterm.man. It gets generated as xterm.1 stored in the

Re: 4.4 release status

2003-12-18 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, David Dawes wrote: So, I'm planning to cut a second release candidate tomorrow, take a Christmas break, and then try to wrap the release up late December/early January. I guess that would be today (I have some changes that I've been testing, for xterm, but was unsure

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: The following CVS commit, made by Thomas Dickey, has no indication that Thomas was either a) not involved at all in the patch or b) that Thomas found Ralf Habacker's patch and committed a modified version of that patch. The CVS log message says

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Your commit didn't mention this either. Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were attributed to Ralf Habacker: tsk, tsk: the actual commit on the code change bears only your name. A casual reader of that commit (and of this

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: XFree86 should be taking care not to steal credit for our patches by committing them without proper attribution. your standards are inconsistent: your committing the change rather than offering commit access to someone who solved a problem that

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: indeed. you have made it onto that select list of people whose patches I have to scrutinize. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Your commit didn't mention this either. Our change log is in our release notes, where the changes were attributed to Ralf Habacker: tsk, tsk: the actual commit

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author. well that's polite enough. unlike Harold. no problem. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: No, that is not good enough. You should amend your change log entry to attribute the patch to Ralf and you should apologize to the X community at large for being so sloppy with attributing credit. yes, you're right. now I'll have to scrutinize

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote: Thomas, If you did get this code directly from Cygwin/X's tree then I'd of expected at least the credit to be apportioned to Harold at the very least, rather than putting your name against it. Ralf's name could have been corrected later, with a

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: The only responsible thing for you to do would be to correct the ChangeLog to attribute it to the patch's author. well that's polite enough. unlike Harold. I have not been

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: I see only minor inconsitency on his part, that the original commit of that code didn't attribute it to its author in the CVS logs, while at least some other commits do note authors of patches. However, he didn't explicitly take credit for it, like you

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Put Ralf's name in the change log!!! you first. (hmm - that's an appropriate pun). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: been corrected later, with a follow email from Harold. It's a simple change to put that right in the CHANGELOG. So I'll do that. I had that on my next set of commits. Then why not say so earlier? There was no point in doing so. -- Thomas

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: a lot of words. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Sure there was: you would not have exposed yourself as a hypocrite by doing exactly that which you denounce on your home page (pointed out by Daniel Armburst). You lambast those egotistical plagiarists that yes, I can imagine that you admire them.

RE: Proper attribution of patches

2003-12-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote: I've seen your postings before, and have no use for your opinions. (that seems to be a common trait of Harold's friends - I don't have to address each one of them). -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net

Re: fix manual page building on Mac OS X

2003-12-29 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Matthieu Herrb wrote: Hi, The process that builds XFree86 manual pages needs cpp -traditional when GNU cpp is used. speaking of manpages, I've been looking at updating rman - some of the HTML which 3.0.8+patches generates is not correct, e.g., tags are not nested. I did

Re: Fwd: [Bug 1027] New: symbol for EAK print keys and PrintScreen is the same

2004-01-01 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, [iso-8859-2] Rafa Rzepecki wrote: On Saturday 27 of December 2003 18:52, Rafa Rzepecki wrote: -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [Bug 1027] New: symbol for EAK print keys and PrintScreen is the same I forwarded this in hope for some discussion to

Re: Building a single program for debugging

2004-01-01 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Ross Boylan wrote: I'm interested in building xterm for debugging on a system that already has a full install of XFree 4.2.1 (Debian GNU/Linux). I realize most of you are probably thinking about newer versions of XFree, but I'm hoping someone might have some useful advice

Re: Some progress and Q's and default font

2004-01-04 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Ross Boylan wrote: With help from the tips here, I've managed to build a debug version of xterm. This shows the font being used is -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--18-180-75-75-p-98-iso10646-1 That's probably from an X resource setting that looks like *VT100*font5:

Re: Some progress and Q's about default font

2004-01-04 Thread Thomas Dickey
at what point you're starting). On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 10:21:27AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Ross Boylan wrote: With help from the tips here, I've managed to build a debug version of xterm. This shows the font being used is -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal

Re: building X11 in separate pieces

2004-01-06 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, [iso-8859-1] Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote: Dear friends, Is it possible to build X11 in pieces? I read that X11 has its own Imake based build system and you can't build X11 in separate pieces such as build tools, server libraries and applications. Instead after a

Re: Return-activation behaviour

2004-01-06 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a test system of a multi monitor (5) Linux RedHat 9.0/Xfree86 4.3 X-Terminal system. Programs and MWM window manager (version 1.2-4) are started from a DEC VMS machine. There is unexpected strange behaviour of the activation key: After

Re: building X11 in separate pieces

2004-01-08 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Warren Turkal wrote: Mario Klebsch wrote: You cannot get anything worse than a compiler error. :-) BTW, what is your intention? I wanna use the freedesktop.org xlib with the XFree86 source tree. Then in that case, you have no other choice than to understand the

Re: building X11 in separate pieces

2004-01-09 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Mario Klebsch wrote: xlib is just a small layer on top of the XLib protocol. So what should be gained by using a different implementation? not much unless there are protocol changes. But without digging to deep into that question, does freedesktop only provide an

Re: building X11 in separate pieces

2004-01-10 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Warren Turkal wrote: I believe that we have it working in all gcc based build environments that it can. sigh: as you're probably aware, an application that builds only with gcc is completely uninteresting to me. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net

Re: Disbandment

2004-01-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Sven Luther wrote: The XFree86 core team has voted to disband itself, effective 31 December 2003. The XFree86 Project and its active cutting-edge developers are all still very much alive and residing in our development forum. Comments about this can be made there;

Re: previously cannot find -lfl now cannot find -ltermcap

2004-01-23 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, [iso-8859-1] Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote: I think termcap should be ported. I am using uClibc-0.9.19 termcap (or ncurses) would be one of your system libraries, and is not part of XFree86. I didn't faced any problem during compilation. why Xfree86 never prompted for

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 Status?

2004-01-24 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Martin Spott wrote: David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0800, Kendall Bennett wrote: [...], and I am in discussions with some of the other members of the community about starting a new project to take over where the XFree86 team

Re: store used VT number in a prop ?

2004-01-25 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Samuel Thibault wrote: It's been a while since I proposed this: ... Le mar 05 aoû 2003 23:09:13 GMT, Samuel Thibault a tapoté sur son clavier : ... And there has not been a single response. I can't think it be difficult to implement for anybody involved in xfree

Re: link xfree86-server statically

2004-02-02 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, netpython wrote: I'm quite a noob and started just 6 month's ago to seriously work with linux ,how could i statically link the xfree86 server on a allready running mandrake linux 9.2 box ( mandrake 9.2 box comes with normal secure enterprise kernels. You can compile the

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Thomas Dickey
is...downright ancient, at least in software terms. Ooops, right. I was only looking at /usr/include. Anyway, some versions of ncurses #undef bool just after #include'ing stdbool.h. Thomas Dickey, ncurses developer, is on this list, so if he's reading this, he probably has some suggestions

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Kelledin wrote: Thomas Dickey said: I don't see the original comment on the mail archive - but have the impression that he's trying to use some definition that relies on the bogus bool from stdbool.h - So I guess the best recommendation is that he should update

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Kelledin wrote: I don't see the original comment on the mail archive - but have the impression that he's trying to use some definition that relies on the bogus bool from stdbool.h - So I guess the best recommendation is that he should update to the regular release

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.3.x: ValueUnion and loaded variable names

2004-02-20 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Mike A. Harris wrote: On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote: This thread actually started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The problem is that gcc's broken define conflicts with our driver API. ISO C99: 7.16 Boolean type and values stdbool.h 1 The header stdbool.h

Re: sourcetree organization

2004-03-16 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Enrico Weigelt wrote: * David Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-03-16 14:47:22 -0500]: snip The only reason for having the source tarball split at all is as a convenience to those downloading over a slow internet connection. If this were not an issue, only the single

Re: Xfree86 4.4 vs Xorg Wrap-up

2004-03-27 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Daniel Stone wrote: try to keep the politics on forum. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: function definition isn't a prototype

2004-04-02 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Terry R. Friedrichsen wrote: From a March 31 CVS update, there are 2714 of the above warnings in a make World when compiling under FreeBSD 5.2 on an Alpha. With some guidance from the committers, I'd like to take on the task of eliminating the vast majority of these.

Re: function definition isn't a prototype

2004-04-02 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Terry R. Friedrichsen wrote: From a March 31 CVS update, there are 2714 of the above warnings in a make World when compiling under FreeBSD 5.2 on an Alpha. With some guidance from the committers, I'd like to take on

Re: FW: license statements in CVS commit messages

2004-04-08 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 03:01:02PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: georgina o. economou wrote: I notice many of the affected files do not bear the license notice mentioned in the checkin notice. Is that intentional? Will everyone investigating the license that applies to a file now have to

Re: FW: license statements in CVS commit messages

2004-04-08 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Ms. Economou's mail client appears to be unable to quote properly. Probably should upgrade (at least to pine ;-) I wrote the original question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] several days ago, ( http://www.mail-archive.com/devel%40xfree86.org/msg05901.html )

Re: license statements in CVS commit messages

2004-04-12 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, David Dawes wrote: On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:42:37AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote: David Dawes wrote: On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 09:05:06AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: I notice many of the affected files do not bear the license notice mentioned in the checkin notice.

Re: xterm display of DEL character

2004-05-12 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 12 May 2004, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: My understanding is that DEL is a control character and that it should be (essentially) ignored when written to a screen. This is the case for old versions of xterm (e.g. XFree86 4.0.1(139) on Red Hat Linux 7.0). This is not the case for newer

Re: xterm display of DEL character

2004-05-12 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 12 May 2004, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: My understanding is that DEL is a control character and that it should be (essentially) ignored when written to a screen. This is the case for old versions of xterm (e.g. XFree86 4.0.1(139) on Red Hat Linux 7.0). This is not the case for newer

Re: xterm display of DEL character

2004-07-11 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | From: Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 15:34:02 -0400 (EDT) | On Wed, 12 May 2004, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote: | | My understanding is that DEL is a control character

Re: xterm dumping core with BSD's malloc

2004-07-19 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Matthieu Herrb wrote: Hi, several users have reported crashes with xterm on OpenBSD with /etc/malloc.conf pointing to 'J' (fill allocated areas with junk). After some debugging, it appears that the following patch is needed to fix that. I saw the commit yesterday via

Re: Drawing text in a bounding box

2004-08-15 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I hope I am writing to the appropriate list for this question. If not, please tell me. I'm new to X programming and I want to draw some text in a bounding box. I've looked in the Xlib manual and saw no function to do what i want. For

Re: Memory leaks when lots of graphical operations? [Qt/X11 3.1.1]

2004-10-16 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Mark Vojkovich wrote: On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Robert Currey wrote: Is there a way to trace X operations? There's no tracing feature in Xlib. xmon? That will trace protocol. Not sure if that's useful for tracking down a client memory leak though. I'm

build problems in programs/xfs

2005-01-21 Thread Thomas Dickey
No one seems to have run into this one, but it's been broken for (me at least) for the past couple of weeks. Ifdef'ing out the conflicting code gets it to build; I'm not sure which change caused it: make[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/build/xfree86/XFree86-cvs050121-build/xc/programs/xfs/difs' gcc

Re: build problems in programs/xfs

2005-01-21 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Marc Aurele La France wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Thomas Dickey wrote: No one seems to have run into this one, but it's been broken for (me at least) for the past couple of weeks. Ifdef'ing out the conflicting code gets it to build; I'm not sure which change caused

Re: build problems in programs/xfs

2005-01-22 Thread Thomas Dickey
yOn Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Marc Aurele La France wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Marc Aurele La France wrote: It would seem that you are building with SharedLibFont explicitly set to NO, which is the default on a Debian system (see linux.cf). The attached, which

Re: XFree86 4.5.0 release schedule

2005-01-24 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 12:10:35AM -0500, David Dawes wrote: I'll be putting up a first draft of the 4.5.0 docs soon, and submissions for release notes content are welcome. I've put up two sets. One is built for the current snapshot and the other for 4.5.0:

Re: [xterm] better support for editors

2005-04-03 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Joseph H Allen wrote: I've patched XTerm, to provide better support for text editors, particularly mine: Joe's Own Editor. Also the patch improves XTerm's speed when the wide-char option is enabled. I've been trying to give this patch to Thomas Dickey, but he has

Re: 4.5.99.12 problem on FreeBSD

2005-10-04 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Takaaki Nomura wrote: I could install 4.5.99.12 xterm on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE with the error message below. I can't find a utmp entry in /etc/group. installing in programs/xterm... /usr/bin/install -c -s -m 6755 -g utmp xterm /usr/X11R6.6/bin/xterm install: utmp: Invalid

Re: Xorg and Cue Problems

2005-10-19 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Rick Knight wrote: I've done some more testing and the problem seems to actually be with KDE. If I start Xorg in failsafe mode and scan in the Xterm window, I can see the Cuecat's output. Also, if I open an xterm in KDE, not a KDE term, I can still scan. It seems that KDE

Re: First 4.6.0 release candidate

2006-03-07 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote: The first release candidate for XFree86 4.6.0 is now available. The source tarball can be found at: ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/develsnaps/XFree86-4.5.99.901.tar.bz2 that's nice. I'm not using the changes which have been recently applied to

Re: how to change mouse select behavior?

2006-03-07 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Jeff Chua wrote: I noticed a few weeks ago with the CVS source, double-click on hte left mouse can select a whole word, then the feature disappeared. which application? I changed a resource value in xterm which affected triple click, but that was in #208, while #209 is

Re: how to change mouse select behavior?

2006-03-08 Thread Thomas Dickey
to triple-clicking, and for the moment had forgotten that charClass applies to double-, triple-clicks equally... Thanks, Jeff On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Jeff Chua wrote: I noticed a few weeks ago with the CVS source, double-click on hte left mouse can

Re: how to change mouse select behavior?

2006-03-08 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Tim Roberts wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Jeff Chua wrote: It's xterm. I'm referring to double-clicking on 1233:03030-30303 and it'll select the whole 1233:03030-30303 instead of 1233 In #208 that was done by changing the charClass resource

Re: how to change mouse select behavior?

2006-03-09 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Jeff Chua wrote: On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote: You're reading it correctly. I was pointing out that there is a better solution than doing that. So for now, how can I bring back that behaviour? What's the syntax for adding charClass to .Xdefaults

Re: xterm warning regressions (was Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk))

2006-03-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote: On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 05:28:02PM -0800, Thomas Dickey wrote: CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs Module name:xc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/03/12 17:28:02 Log message: 241. Xterm patch #210 (Thomas Dickey). This reinstates the following

Re: xterm warning regressions (was Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk))

2006-03-15 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote: On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 06:49:49PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: than those addressed by the fix for lastlog(). That was using the configure script of course. Perhaps having the particular -D's set by imake would help focus the discussion. gcc -c -O2

Re: xterm warning regressions (was Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk))

2006-03-16 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Marc Aurele La France wrote: On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, David Dawes wrote: and adds this one: main.c:2586: warning: `pty_search' defined but not used yes, that's an annoyance (but the proposed fix reversed the general process

Re: xterm warning regressions (was Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk))

2006-03-16 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Marc Aurele La France wrote: main.c, rather than refining it in xterm.h as a fallback for a configure script test. That's irrelevent. My fix holds whether xterm is built through imake or no, it is relevant. I considered a change like that some time ago, decided that

Re: make install fails

2006-03-26 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/XFree86/4.2/std/xc/programs/xterm' install -c `if [ \`grep ^utmp: /etc/group\` ]; then echo ' -m 2755 -g utmp'; else echo ' -m 4711'; fi` xterm /usr/X11R6-v4/bin/xterm install: installing multiple files, but

Re: xterm's ongoing setgid saga

2006-04-04 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Marc Aurele La France wrote: This still isn't right, for `make install`. Indeed, not all glibc-based then fix it in config/cf/*, where it belongs. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ___

Re: xterm's ongoing setgid saga

2006-04-04 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Marc Aurele La France wrote: On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Marc Aurele La France wrote: This still isn't right, for `make install`. Indeed, not all glibc-based then fix it in config/cf/*, where it belongs. Not really. xterm

ANN: xterm #217

2006-08-20 Thread Thomas Dickey
xterm supports ANSI color, VT220 emulation and UTF-8 There's an faq at http://invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm.faq.html ftp://invisible-island.net/xterm/ Patch #217 - 2006/8/20 * minor improvements to FreeType font layout and drawing. * add

ANN: xterm #218

2006-08-27 Thread Thomas Dickey
xterm supports ANSI color, VT220 emulation and UTF-8 There's an faq at http://invisible-island.net/xterm/xterm.faq.html ftp://invisible-island.net/xterm/ Patch #218 - 2006/8/27 * change behavior when encountering an illegal character in a title

ANN: xterm-219

2006-09-04 Thread Thomas Dickey
Patch #219 - 2006/9/4 * some internal restructuring to separate data for vt100 and tek4014 widgets. * fix a few cases where form-events would be seen by the vt100 widget when built with the toolbar configuration. -- Thomas E. Dickey

ANN: xterm-220

2006-09-10 Thread Thomas Dickey
Patch #220 - 2006/9/10 * make xterm -t -iconic work as expected, i.e., start in tek4014 mode, but iconified. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net pgpJDeUSGHzz7.pgp Description: PGP signature

ANN: xterm-222

2006-10-17 Thread Thomas Dickey
Patch #222 - 2006/10/17 * minor optimization for recoloring cursor via dynamic colors. * fix a bug caused by restructuring of tek4014 widget (report by Paul Schenkeveld) -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net

ANN: xterm-223

2006-11-30 Thread Thomas Dickey
Patch #223 - 2006/11/30 * add --enable-rectangles configure option (request by Martin Pirker). * correct default value for --with-symlink configure option. * fixes configure script macros that use $X_EXTRA_LIBS. * modify configure

ANN: xterm-228

2007-07-22 Thread Thomas Dickey
Patch #228 - 2007/7/22 * modify configure script to permit combining --with-utempter and --enable-setuid, e.g., for using xterm with the utempter library on FreeBSD (report by Andriy Gapon). * modify Quit menu entry to override the

ANN: xterm patch #229

2007-08-12 Thread Thomas Dickey
Patch #229 - 2008/8/12 * override locale in minstall.sh; change in [233]patch #226 does not work in UTF-8 locale (report by Zdenek Sekera). * undo an incorrect fix for a memory leak in [234]patch #209 (Debian #435858). -- Thomas E. Dickey

ANN: xterm #230

2007-12-31 Thread Thomas Dickey
Patch #230 - 2007/12/31 * add quietGrab resource, which when true, suppresses cursor repainting when NotifyGrab and NotifyUngrab event types are received during change of focus (request by Nicolas George). * do not treat

Re: ANN: xterm #230

2008-01-03 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:16:35AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Thomas Dickey wrote: Patch #230 - 2007/12/31 Compiled and installed ok, but when I tried to compile another program ... basically with a lot of screen output, the new xterm

ANN: xterm patch #232

2008-01-30 Thread Thomas Dickey
Patch #232 - 2008/01/30 * corrected logic in a font-cache used for reverse-video (Debian #404079). * add control sequence to alter pointerMode at runtime. * add limit-checks for rectangle operation parameters (report by Martin

ANN: xterm patch #233

2008-02-24 Thread Thomas Dickey
Patch #233 - 2008/02/24 * add configure check for ttydefaults.h, include if needed, e.g., for systems where defining _POSIX_C_SOURCE, etc., prevents it from being included via termios.h (prompted by comments by Robert Delius Royar and

  1   2   >