Re: Cygwin/XFree86 - No longer associated with XFree86.org
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:35:20AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote: 6) Alternatives are being evaluated for hosting Cygwin/XFree86 code in CVS. Hosts that can provide CVS commit access for at least five Cygwin/XFree86 developers will be given priority. Harold, I thought you already had the CVS for Cygwin/XFree86 sorted out, by using what you'd already setup in http://sf.net/projects/xoncygwin ? You and Alexander Gottwald (and myself) have already been using this for quite some time now. Couldn't you give Kensuke et al commit access there rather than seeking out yet another repository ? Alan. ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Cygwin/XFree86 - No longer associated with XFree86.org
Alan Hourihane wrote: On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:35:20AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote: 6) Alternatives are being evaluated for hosting Cygwin/XFree86 code in CVS. Hosts that can provide CVS commit access for at least five Cygwin/XFree86 developers will be given priority. Harold, I thought you already had the CVS for Cygwin/XFree86 sorted out, by using what you'd already setup in http://sf.net/projects/xoncygwin ? It is something I am looking into. It all depends on if we want to have to import and maintain the clients. You and Alexander Gottwald (and myself) have already been using this for quite some time now. Couldn't you give Kensuke et al commit access there rather than seeking out yet another repository ? Looking into it. Harold ___ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
