Ramzec requested changes on this pull request.
> @@ -2940,7 +2916,8 @@ dbuf_rele_and_unlock(dmu_buf_impl_t *db, void *tag)
db->db.db_size, db);
mutex_exit(>db_mtx);
- if (db->db_caching_status ==
Merged #646.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/646#event-1660129163
--
openzfs: openzfs-developer
Permalink:
Was there any progress on this? Seems around may last year activity on this
died down.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/172#issuecomment-394183636
@Ramzec This is 3rd hand info... would be great if someone from Nexenta
(@skiselkov ?) could file a bug report.
```
Thread A is evicting dbufs that are related to dnodeA
dnode_evict_dbufs(dnoneA) enters dn_dbufs_mtx after that walks the AVL of dbufs
and calls:
@lundman @GernotS I added 3 commits which should gather more debugging info.
@GernotS if you can run your workload with the latest bits, hopefully we will
get more info to diagnose the issues you've been seeing.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to
Could you please explain how the change handles the 3rd problem?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/645#issuecomment-394149250
--
