Hello!
I must admit that when I was working on REPARSE, I just straight up assumed
I had to create things myself, since "I was first" on Windows. That is my bad.
I already have a user pointing this out, that we should be compatible with SMB;
https://github.com/openzfsonwindows/ZFSin/issues/107
Jorgen, how are the new windows file flags different from the existing
ones, specifically:
ZFS_REPARSEPOINT -> ZFS_REPARSE
ZFS_SIMMUTABLE -> ZFS_IMMUTABLE
ZFS_SAPPENDONLY -> ZFS_APPENDONLY
As I recall, these were implemented for CIFS/SMB. I would hope that local
Windows access has the same semant
I'm not sure who to ask about this, but I'm curious whether the new
ZFS_REPARSEPOINT might be redundant with the existing flag (in the
"dos attributes field") XAT_REPARSE. See:
http://src.illumos.org/source/search?project=illumos-gate&refs=XAT_REPARSE
The illumos in-kernel SMB server uses links wi
