Hello!
I must admit that when I was working on REPARSE, I just straight up assumed
I had to create things myself, since "I was first" on Windows. That is my bad.
I already have a user pointing this out, that we should be compatible with SMB;
Jorgen, how are the new windows file flags different from the existing
ones, specifically:
ZFS_REPARSEPOINT -> ZFS_REPARSE
ZFS_SIMMUTABLE -> ZFS_IMMUTABLE
ZFS_SAPPENDONLY -> ZFS_APPENDONLY
As I recall, these were implemented for CIFS/SMB. I would hope that local
Windows access has the same
I'm not sure who to ask about this, but I'm curious whether the new
ZFS_REPARSEPOINT might be redundant with the existing flag (in the
"dos attributes field") XAT_REPARSE. See:
http://src.illumos.org/source/search?project=illumos-gate=XAT_REPARSE
The illumos in-kernel SMB server uses links with
To bring us up to date now, on the OsX and Windows platforms, I have
(internally) made the following reservations as compared to ZOL;
We have no additional command-line options.
File flags (zfs_znode.h)
+/* Unsure how we officially register new flags bits, but
+ * I guess we will
As discussed at the December OpenZFS Leadership Meeting[1], we would like
to make sure that all stakeholders are informed of important proposed
changes, regardless of what platform they originate on (Linux, illumos,
FreeBSD, etc). This will help us get input from the best experts at code
review
