Closed #582 via 68fd0f19dedb96a20444f464246af332988587d8.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/582#event-1604096519
--
openzfs: openzf
@asomers , could you please push (and rebase before that) to trigger another
build?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/582#issuecomment-381497292
-
This looks good to go once we confirm that the tests pass.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/582#issuecomment-373844114
--
openzfs:
avg-I approved this pull request.
Looked good for FreeBSD, still looks good.
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/582#pullrequestreview-101320066
--
ahrens approved this pull request.
I'm not sure that this design of having callers check `errno` is the best, but
your fix seems reasonable given how this is used.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://g
