On Thu, 2018-10-25 at 17:26 +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 13:25 +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > > [cross-posting to openstack-dev]
> > >
> > Are these agents copies
> > of your openstack agents, or completely separate developments?
>
> Completely
Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 13:25 +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
[cross-posting to openstack-dev]
Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote:
[snipped]
> - openstack-cinder-volume
> - openstack-floating-ip
> - openstack-info
That's an interesting development.
By popular demand from the
On 25/10/18 08:51 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 13:25 +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
[cross-posting to openstack-dev]
Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote:
[snipped]
> - openstack-cinder-volume
> - openstack-floating-ip
> - openstack-info
That's an interesting development.
By
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 13:25 +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> [cross-posting to openstack-dev]
>
> Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote:
> [snipped]
>
> > - openstack-cinder-volume
> > - openstack-floating-ip
> > - openstack-info
>
> That's an interesting development.
>
> By popular demand from the community,
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 16:35 +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 04:22:52PM +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> > Do you mean additional python module dependencies, or that the
> > dependency on python itself seems like added weight? Because since
> > python is a dependency of
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 04:22:52PM +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> Do you mean additional python module dependencies, or that the
> dependency on python itself seems like added weight? Because since
> python is a dependency of pacemaker as well as both crmsh, pcs and
> fence-agents already, it
On Wed, 2018-10-24 at 14:42 +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > No doubt I've missed some pros and cons here. At this point
> > personally I'm slightly leaning towards keeping them in the
> > openstack-resource-agents - but that's
On 24/10/18 14:42 +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> No doubt I've missed some pros and cons here. At this point
>> personally I'm slightly leaning towards keeping them in the
>> openstack-resource-agents - but that's assuming I can
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote:
> No doubt I've missed some pros and cons here. At this point
> personally I'm slightly leaning towards keeping them in the
> openstack-resource-agents - but that's assuming I can either hand off
> maintainership to someone with more
[cross-posting to openstack-dev]
Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote:
ClusterLabs is happy to announce resource-agents v4.2.0.
Source code is available at:
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/releases/tag/v4.2.0
The most significant enhancements in this release are:
- new resource agents:
10 matches
Mail list logo
