Ken Gaillot napsal(a):
On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 12:52 -0500, Digimer wrote:
On 2018-02-09 03:27 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
Hello,
there is certainly whole can of these worms, put first that crosses
my mind: performing double (de)compression on two levels of
abstraction
in the inter-node communication
On 12/02/18 08:04, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Ken Gaillot napsal(a):
>> On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 12:52 -0500, Digimer wrote:
>>> On 2018-02-09 03:27 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
Hello,
there is certainly whole can of these worms, put first that crosses
my mind: performing double (de)compressio
[let's move this to developers list]
On 12/02/18 07:22 +0100, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> (and especially the libqb developers)
>
> I started hacking on a python library written in C which links to
> pacemaker, and so to libqb as well, but I'm encountering a strange
> problem which I don't know
On 02/12/2018 09:21 AM, Christine Caulfield wrote:
> On 12/02/18 08:04, Jan Friesse wrote:
>> Ken Gaillot napsal(a):
>>> On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 12:52 -0500, Digimer wrote:
On 2018-02-09 03:27 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there is certainly whole can of these worms, put first
Jan Pokorný writes:
> I guess you are linking your python extension with one of the
> pacemaker libraries (directly on indirectly to libcrmcommon), and in
> that case, you need to rebuild pacemaker with the patched libqb[*] for
> the whole arrangement to work. Likewise in that case, as you may b
