I was busy with the 'poll' contribution, and figured, that for real good
performance, the updating in the database could better be 'collected'
during a certain amount of time, before actual persistance occurs.
Turns out that something like that can be quite easily achieved using the
It sounds a wierd hack to me.
Why would a delayed update be 10 times faster than a normal update? I
would have expected it to be a little less. It can't be the database
overhead so it must be code in MMbase. My guess is the eventsystem and
cache updates.
The example is not very realistic
Nico Klasens wrote:
It sounds a wierd hack to me.
Why would a delayed update be 10 times faster than a normal update? I
would have expected it to be a little less. It can't be the database
overhead so it must be code in MMbase. My guess is the eventsystem and
cache updates.
I mean that
