Eduard Witteveen wrote:
Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
CALL FOR: New attributes on StorageManager.
Follows a long story, I'll add an abstract near the end.
Shouldnt this be on the DatabaseStorageManager(protected on the class)?
From what i understand is that the database chars are
[X] +1 (YES)
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered -- Daniel Barlow
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
[x] +1 (YES)
marcel maatkamp
VPRO Digitaal
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
On Jan 31, 2005, at 9:30 PM, Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
[X] +1 (YES)
Daniel.
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
[...]
So, I'll fix that CP1252 is interpreted as such if the database is
ISO-8859-1. That can never harm, because there are no ISO-8859-1
characters which are not on the same place in CP1252. Now, you fetch
'correct' strings in any case.
I've
Arjan Lamers wrote:
database searches for example can produce akward results. Just to warn you
for this sort of 'dirty hacks'. I dont know the internals of mmbase that
well, so i don't know if there are any other problems with charsets in
mmbase.
I am aware of the risques. My higher goal
CALL FOR: New attributes on StorageManager.
Follows a long story, I'll add an abstract near the end.
I want to add a few new attributes to StorageManager and one to
DatabaseStorageManager.
I'll first eplain why we need it, then what I propose.
It has to do with bug #6569 : Taglibs Using
[X] +1 (YES)
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
