At 16:22 +0200 02-05-2005, Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
As announced in the thread 'MMBase Imaging, request for comments on
changes.', I have made some improvements on the imaging framework of
MMBase.
I want to offer these changes for inclusion CVS HEAD now. Some of these
things may be fit for
As announced in the thread 'MMBase Imaging, request for comments on
changes.', I have made some improvements on the imaging framework of
MMBase.
I want to offer these changes for inclusion CVS HEAD now. Some of these
things may be fit for backporting to 1.7, but we'll consider that later.
I
[X] +1 (YES)
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
[X] +1 (YES)
___
Developers mailing list
Developers@lists.mmbase.org
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
[x] +1 (YES)
ps: about the checksum, can't this be handled by a lastmodified field?
(there is a theoretical possibility that 2 images have a matching checksum)
I must say that i like the idea of putting a unique key on the checksum,
but i dont know if this is wanted
E Witteveen wrote:
Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
[x] +1 (YES)
ps: about the checksum, can't this be handled by a lastmodified field?
Yes, that would be a possibility. (I suppose that you mean 'an
'automatic' field like 'lastmodified'').
That could well be the way on which I'll implement
- I was pondering about an yet another extra field on images 'checksum',
which would store a checksum on the handle field (a suggestion of
Daniel). This would make it easy to check if a image was uploaded
already.
I don't see any benefit. uploading a new image will brake a checksum
Kees Jongenburger wrote:
- I was pondering about an yet another extra field on images 'checksum',
which would store a checksum on the handle field (a suggestion of
Daniel). This would make it easy to check if a image was uploaded
already.
I don't see any benefit. uploading a new
On 5/2/05, Michiel Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'checksum' field would be on the 'images' node, which provides you with
some way to check if the same image was uploaded already. It is imaginable
that a person forgot about wether a certain image was uploaded
already or not.
Who is
On May 2, 2005, at 10:31 PM, Kees Jongenburger wrote:
On 5/2/05, Michiel Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'checksum' field would be on the 'images' node, which provides
you with
some way to check if the same image was uploaded already. It is
imaginable
that a person forgot about wether a
Kees Jongenburger wrote:
On 5/2/05, Michiel Meeuwissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 'checksum' field would be on the 'images' node, which provides you with
some way to check if the same image was uploaded already. It is imaginable
that a person forgot about wether a certain image was
11 matches
Mail list logo
