On 21/09/16 14:50 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> I like where this is going.
> Although I don’t think we want to get into the business of trying to
> script config changes from one agent to another, so I’d drop #4
Not agent parameter changes, just its specification -- to reflect
formally what the
Hello,
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/846 seems to be
a first crack on integrating systemd to otherwise init-system-unaware
resource-agents.
As pacemaker already handles native systemd integration, I wonder if
it wouldn't be better to just allow, on top of that, perhaps as
sp
Hi Jan,
Jan Pokorný wrote:
> Hello,
>
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/846 seems to be
> a first crack on integrating systemd to otherwise init-system-unaware
> resource-agents.
>
> As pacemaker already handles native systemd integration, I wonder if
> it wouldn't be better
On 09/21/2016 10:55 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 21/09/16 14:50 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> I like where this is going.
>> Although I don’t think we want to get into the business of trying to
>> script config changes from one agent to another, so I’d drop #4
>
> Not agent parameter changes, jus
On 09/21/2016 03:25 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/846 seems to be
>> a first crack on integrating systemd to otherwise init-system-unaware
>> resource-agents.
>>
>> As pacemaker already handles native sy