On 09/21/2016 10:55 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 21/09/16 14:50 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> I like where this is going.
>> Although I don’t think we want to get into the business of trying to
>> script config changes from one agent to another, so I’d drop #4
>
> Not agent parameter changes,
On 21/09/16 14:50 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> I like where this is going.
> Although I don’t think we want to get into the business of trying to
> script config changes from one agent to another, so I’d drop #4
Not agent parameter changes, just its specification -- to reflect
formally what the
I like where this is going.
Although I don’t think we want to get into the business of trying to script
config changes from one agent to another, so I’d drop #4
I would make .deprecated a nested directory so that if we want to retire (for
example) a ClusterLabs agent in the future we can
On 18/08/16 15:31 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
> A pet peeve of mine would also be to move heartbeat/IPaddr2 to
> clusterlabs/IP, to finally get rid of that weird 2 in the name...
Just recalled I used to be uncomfortable with "apache" (also present
in rgmanager's breed of RAs) as it's no
On 19/08/16 13:12 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 19/08/16 11:14 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> On 19/08/16 10:59 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>>> So, having some more thoughts on this, here's the possible action
>>> plan (just for heartbeat -> clusterlabs transition + deprecating
>>> some agents, but
On 19/08/16 11:14 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 19/08/16 10:59 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> So, having some more thoughts on this, here's the possible action
>> plan (just for heartbeat -> clusterlabs transition + deprecating
>> some agents, but clusterlabs-staging -> clusterlabs would be
On 08/18/2016 05:16 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 08/18/2016 08:31 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
>> Jan Pokorný writes:
>>
>>> Thinking about that, ClusterLabs may be considered a brand established
>>> well enough for "clusterlabs" provider to work better than anything
>>>
Jan Pokorný writes:
> Thinking about that, ClusterLabs may be considered a brand established
> well enough for "clusterlabs" provider to work better than anything
> general such as previously proposed "core". Also, it's not expected
> there will be more RA-centered projects
On 15/08/16 12:37 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 18/07/16 11:13 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> A suggestion came up recently to formalize a new version of the OCF
>> resource agent API standard[1].
>>
>> The main goal would be to formalize the API as it is actually used
>> today, and to replace the
On 18/07/16 11:13 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> A suggestion came up recently to formalize a new version of the OCF
> resource agent API standard[1].
>
> The main goal would be to formalize the API as it is actually used
> today, and to replace the "unique" meta-data attribute with two new
>
On 19/07/16 16:51, Klaus Wenninger wrote:
On 07/19/2016 04:33 PM, Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote:
On 19/07/16 14:35, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:13:42AM -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
A suggestion came up recently to formalize a new version of the OCF
resource agent API standard[1].
On 07/19/2016 09:33 AM, Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote:
> On 19/07/16 14:35, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:13:42AM -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>>> A suggestion came up recently to formalize a new version of the OCF
>>> resource agent API standard[1].
>>>
>>> The main goal would be to
On 07/19/2016 04:33 PM, Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote:
> On 19/07/16 14:35, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:13:42AM -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>>> A suggestion came up recently to formalize a new version of the OCF
>>> resource agent API standard[1].
>>>
>>> The main goal would be to
13 matches
Mail list logo