Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-09-21 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 09/21/2016 10:55 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 21/09/16 14:50 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> I like where this is going. >> Although I don’t think we want to get into the business of trying to >> script config changes from one agent to another, so I’d drop #4 > > Not agent parameter changes,

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-09-21 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 21/09/16 14:50 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > I like where this is going. > Although I don’t think we want to get into the business of trying to > script config changes from one agent to another, so I’d drop #4 Not agent parameter changes, just its specification -- to reflect formally what the

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-09-20 Thread Andrew Beekhof
I like where this is going. Although I don’t think we want to get into the business of trying to script config changes from one agent to another, so I’d drop #4 I would make .deprecated a nested directory so that if we want to retire (for example) a ClusterLabs agent in the future we can

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-09-05 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 18/08/16 15:31 +0200, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > A pet peeve of mine would also be to move heartbeat/IPaddr2 to > clusterlabs/IP, to finally get rid of that weird 2 in the name... Just recalled I used to be uncomfortable with "apache" (also present in rgmanager's breed of RAs) as it's no

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-08-19 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 19/08/16 13:12 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 19/08/16 11:14 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 19/08/16 10:59 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >>> So, having some more thoughts on this, here's the possible action >>> plan (just for heartbeat -> clusterlabs transition + deprecating >>> some agents, but

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-08-19 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 19/08/16 11:14 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 19/08/16 10:59 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> So, having some more thoughts on this, here's the possible action >> plan (just for heartbeat -> clusterlabs transition + deprecating >> some agents, but clusterlabs-staging -> clusterlabs would be

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-08-18 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 08/18/2016 05:16 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 08/18/2016 08:31 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: >> Jan Pokorný writes: >> >>> Thinking about that, ClusterLabs may be considered a brand established >>> well enough for "clusterlabs" provider to work better than anything >>>

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-08-18 Thread Kristoffer Grönlund
Jan Pokorný writes: > Thinking about that, ClusterLabs may be considered a brand established > well enough for "clusterlabs" provider to work better than anything > general such as previously proposed "core". Also, it's not expected > there will be more RA-centered projects

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-08-18 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 15/08/16 12:37 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 18/07/16 11:13 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> A suggestion came up recently to formalize a new version of the OCF >> resource agent API standard[1]. >> >> The main goal would be to formalize the API as it is actually used >> today, and to replace the

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-08-15 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 18/07/16 11:13 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: > A suggestion came up recently to formalize a new version of the OCF > resource agent API standard[1]. > > The main goal would be to formalize the API as it is actually used > today, and to replace the "unique" meta-data attribute with two new >

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-07-20 Thread Oyvind Albrigtsen
On 19/07/16 16:51, Klaus Wenninger wrote: On 07/19/2016 04:33 PM, Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote: On 19/07/16 14:35, Lars Ellenberg wrote: On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:13:42AM -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: A suggestion came up recently to formalize a new version of the OCF resource agent API standard[1].

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-07-19 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 07/19/2016 09:33 AM, Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote: > On 19/07/16 14:35, Lars Ellenberg wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:13:42AM -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: >>> A suggestion came up recently to formalize a new version of the OCF >>> resource agent API standard[1]. >>> >>> The main goal would be to

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-07-19 Thread Klaus Wenninger
On 07/19/2016 04:33 PM, Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote: > On 19/07/16 14:35, Lars Ellenberg wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:13:42AM -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: >>> A suggestion came up recently to formalize a new version of the OCF >>> resource agent API standard[1]. >>> >>> The main goal would be to