Re: [Development] Feature freeze date?

2011-12-16 Thread morten.sorvig
On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:01 AM, ext jason.mcdon...@nokia.com wrote: Having been release manager for several past Qt feature releases (4.5 to 4.7), I'm wary of setting a single feature freeze date and having a big rush to cram all the new features into the master branch in the last couple of

Re: [Development] Commit policy (was: Qt Commercial 4.8.0 release delta to LGPL version)

2011-12-16 Thread Sergio Ahumada
Hi, On 12/15/2011 10:31 PM, ext Robin Burchell wrote: Hi, On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Robin Burchellrobin...@viroteck.net wrote: Wasn't the policy to first push the code in Qt5, then backport in Qt 4.8? I'd agree that would make sense to be a policy. But for it to be a policy, it

Re: [Development] Moving QUndoStack and QUndoCommand out of QtWidgets

2011-12-16 Thread Nils Jeisecke
Hi, I'd like to see a QUndoCommand::setFailed http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-963 implemented in Qt 5. Any opinions about this? I'm currently struggling with getting Qt 5 compiled on Mac OS X but as soon as I've got it running I'd like to contribute an implementation via gerrit.

Re: [Development] QRegularExpression -- first round of API review

2011-12-16 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:07:26AM +, ext Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: On 15 December 2011 19:45, Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@nokia.com wrote:     void setPatternOptions(PatternOptions options, bool on = true); i don't like that too much, because *un*setting options en masse

Re: [Development] Qt Commercial 4.8.0 release delta to LGPL version

2011-12-16 Thread David Faure
On Thursday 15 December 2011 11:21:41 Turunen Tuukka wrote: So now there is total of 108 improvements and bug fixes available in Qt Commercial 4.8.0 that are not part of the LGPL release. While I understand the reasons, I want to state that this is going to make support a mess. Both versions

Re: [Development] Commit policy (was: Qt Commercial 4.8.0 release delta to LGPL version)

2011-12-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Friday, 16 de December de 2011 11.07.03, Sergio Ahumada wrote: One idea is to have an automated process that propose the changes to be merged from Qt 4.(x-1) to Qt 4.x in Gerrit as a patch (in the likes of what has been done to update the Qt5 sha1, e.g.

Re: [Development] Commit policy (was: Qt Commercial 4.8.0 release delta to LGPL version)

2011-12-16 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Friday 16 December 2011 12:54:40 Shaw Andy wrote: On 12/16/11 1:18 PM, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com wrote: On Friday 16 December 2011 12:48:32 Thiago Macieira wrote: On Friday, 16 de December de 2011 11.07.03, Sergio Ahumada wrote: One idea is to have an automated process that

Re: [Development] MIME type support in Qt5

2011-12-16 Thread marius.storm-olsen
On 16/12/2011 09:02, wolf-michael.bo...@nokia.com wrote: One of the next steps that I'd like to pursue is moving the repository to qt-project.org. We seem to have the option of adding QtMimeType as a playground project or a real addon module. Since I've never actually done this myself I'd

Re: [Development] Qt Commercial 4.8.0 release delta to LGPL version

2011-12-16 Thread Craig.Scott
On 16/12/2011, at 10:37 PM, David Faure wrote: On Thursday 15 December 2011 11:21:41 Turunen Tuukka wrote: So now there is total of 108 improvements and bug fixes available in Qt Commercial 4.8.0 that are not part of the LGPL release. While I understand the reasons, I want to state that