Hi All,
We would like to release next version of Qt Commercial 4.8 around mid-March.
It would be really great if we can again sync the LGPL and Commercial releases
both in timing and content to the extent possible.
If we agree that mid-March is a good target time for the next patch release,
Hi everybody,
as some of you might know, our current maintainer for QtNetwork, Peter
Hartmann, has left Nokia to start in a different job. Unfortunately that
new job doesn't leave him with enough time to continue as the maintainer
of QtNetwork, so he stepped down as the maintainer of QtNetwork.
You've correctly understood the problem, but the scale is less bad (takes a
couple of minutes to exhaust 2GB limit of a 32 bit process using a loopback
connection)
Changing the default would mean behavior is the same as if you called
setReadBufferSize(65536) in the application. Currently the
On segunda-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2012 14.05.36, marius.storm-
ol...@nokia.com wrote:
On 02/13/2012 07:17 AM, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
Shane Kearns has however stepped up and is willing to take over the
position. I'm really happy that Shane is willing to take this job. He
has a
Hi Turunen Tuukka,
could there please be an official VS 2010 64-bit binary release for
Microsoft Windows for Qt 4.8.1 onwards?
Thanks a lot kind regards,
Wolfgang Baron
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
On segunda-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2012 12.28.06, Turunen Tuukka wrote:
Hi All,
We would like to release next version of Qt Commercial 4.8 around mid-March.
It would be really great if we can again sync the LGPL and Commercial
releases both in timing and content to the extent possible.
On Friday, February 03, 2012 12:17:35 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
Hi,
It seems like this change broke qt/qttools, can you confirm this please ?
I'd assume qttools doesn't include the qtquick1 repo as a dependency.
It needs declarative in Qt4 because lupdate uses it to extract translations.
On Monday, February 13, 2012 09:04:22 casper.vandonde...@nokia.com wrote:
Whatever is chosen (updating qdoc, or changing to Doxygen): The task is
not small, and therefore it would be nice if there would be more
contributors than just me and Martin Smith. Maybe it would be a good idea
to have a
On 02/13/2012 08:10 AM, ext shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote:
Not sure. Is it a big problem? Or is it better to just continue as
is, and let the applications that do have a problem set it to
something reasonable to them instead?
I'd probably suggest that we instead improve the output on that
On Monday 13 February 2012 18:33:51 marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote:
On 02/13/2012 08:10 AM, ext shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote:
Not sure. Is it a big problem? Or is it better to just continue as
is, and let the applications that do have a problem set it to
something reasonable to them
On 02/13/2012 12:33 PM, ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com wrote:
^shrug^ but I rather not have applications start failing at random due
to a failure to have a new limit.
..handle a new limit.
--
.marius
___
Development mailing list
On sexta-feira, 10 de fevereiro de 2012 19.25.04, shane.kea...@accenture.com
wrote:
We could change the default read buffer size from 0 (unbounded) to a
sensible default value e.g. 64k (to be benchmarked) Applications wanting
the old behaviour could explicitly call setReadBufferSize(0)
Maybe you're looking at a triage role, if the role is prioritizing and
assigning of tasks among a team that is mostly funded by one company.
Another role we need in JIRA is contributor.
This is somebody who is not a reviewer, but can still be assigned tasks
transition their assigned tasks
On 02/13/2012 01:27 PM, ext
shane.kea...@accenture.commailto:shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote:
Maybe you're looking at a triage role, if the role is prioritizing and
assigning of tasks among a team that is mostly funded by one company.
Another role we need in JIRA is contributor.
This is
On 2/13/12 4:17 PM, ext Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:
On segunda-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2012 14.05.36, marius.storm-
ol...@nokia.com wrote:
On 02/13/2012 07:17 AM, ext lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote:
Shane Kearns has however stepped up and is willing to take over the
Hi Denis,
I have a question about the license for QSerialDevice. In gitorious it
appears as GPLv3.
I think it could be interesting to have a more permisive licensing
option such as LGPL or BSD. This will allow to push forward this library
compared with others such as QextSerialPort with not
Hi,
While using Qt's elidedText function
http://developer.qt.nokia.com/doc/qt-4.8/qfontmetricsf.html#elidedText i
noticed the function was dog slow. For just 1000 entries (each 250 chars)
eliding them to 200px took about 190ms on windows and 100ms on linux. Using
that for drawing is noticeable
Given that the QSerialDevice developers have accepted the CLA for the project
effective from start of the project, the project is now open for licencing both
under LGPL and commercial license; just like any other module in Qt. AFAIK,
though IANAL.
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 2/13/12 16:56
On 13.2.2012 18.32, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On segunda-feira, 13 de fevereiro de 2012 12.28.06, Turunen Tuukka wrote:
Hi All,
We would like to release next version of Qt Commercial 4.8 around
mid-March.
It would be really great if we can again sync the LGPL and
Hi all.
Yes, most likely LGPL + commercial. So, there is no reason to worry.
Best regards,
Denis
14.02.2012, 04:08, marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com:
Given that the QSerialDevice developers have accepted the CLA for the project
effective from start of the project, the project is now open for
Hi all.
Well, what with the Code Review? Who controls it?
I prepared the first review here: http://codereview.qt-project.org/16042
1) Interested in the question about the type of macro QT_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_XXX,
QT_END_NAMESPACE_XXX, etc.
What a way to more correct: leave these macros (as in the
21 matches
Mail list logo
