Re: [Development] Documentation snapshots available on doc-snapshot.qt-project.org

2012-03-17 Thread Girish Ramakrishnan
Add ons. Girish 2012/3/16 quim@nokia.com: Right, sorry for the confusion. Should I list Qt OpenGL under Essentials or Add-ons? Quim On 3/16/12 7:01 PM Storm-Olsen Marius (Nokia-MP/Austin) wrote: Wohaa! I don't think i said to purge the QtOpenGL docs, those are still valid. It's

Re: [Development] Qt 5 and old versions of XCB

2012-03-17 Thread Pier Luigi
2012/3/17 Bradley Smith bsm...@baysmith.com: The workaround for systems that don't meet the minimum requirements is to upgrade. Running brand, new and bleeding edge Qt 5 on an old system is not a target for us. Simply upgrade -- at the very least the requirements. Is it possible to upgrade

Re: [Development] The qtbase CI should run the qtdeclarative tests

2012-03-17 Thread Donald Carr
Golf clap I relish modularity, but construing a hard dependency as a soft dependency is inviting a world of hurt for the CI underpant gnomes (/me makes a note to buy Kent flowers next time he is in Oslo) On Mar 16, 2012 3:14 PM, kent.han...@nokia.com wrote: Hi, Again the qtdeclarative CI has

Re: [Development] Qt 5 and old versions of XCB

2012-03-17 Thread Craig.Scott
On 18/03/2012, at 9:58 AM, Pier Luigi wrote: 2012/3/17 Bradley Smith bsm...@baysmith.com: The workaround for systems that don't meet the minimum requirements is to upgrade. Running brand, new and bleeding edge Qt 5 on an old system is not a target for us. Simply upgrade -- at the very

Re: [Development] Qt 5 and old versions of XCB

2012-03-17 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 18 de março de 2012 11.43.02, craig.sc...@csiro.au wrote: That's fine when you are only building an application to run on your machine, but for people who want to distribute Qt5 apps, this would be an undesirable solution. You'd end up having to ship the xcb libraries as well as

Re: [Development] Qt 5 and old versions of XCB

2012-03-17 Thread Craig.Scott
On 18/03/2012, at 11:53 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On domingo, 18 de março de 2012 11.43.02, craig.sc...@csiro.au wrote: That's fine when you are only building an application to run on your machine, but for people who want to distribute Qt5 apps, this would be an undesirable solution. You'd

Re: [Development] Qt 5 and old versions of XCB

2012-03-17 Thread Robin Burchell
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:03 AM, craig.sc...@csiro.au wrote: Wow. are you suggesting that we're only interested in ensuring Qt5 runs on systems that 18 months old or newer? That's going to make a lot of enemies. opensuse 11.1 was released in 2008. that's a lot more than 18 months.