On 11/29/2012 07:38 PM, Sean Harmer wrote:
On 29/11/2012 18:34, BRM wrote:
From: Alan Alpert 4163654...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Development] Comparing two reals in Qt code
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Sean Harmer sean.har...@kdab.com wrote:
... pretty please (with a red cherry on top) give everyone a heads-up ahead of
time.
This is the second time within the same week that a source incompatible change
is staged _before_ giving a heads-up. (QStyle subclasses on Monday)
The renaming of QQuickItem::pos() to position() is certainly
On Friday, November 30, 2012 05:38:22 AM Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
I know that branch naming is a possible topic for endless bike shedding.
You can always find arguments against a certain name here. In the end it's
not the
On Friday 30. November 2012 09.23.32 Samuel Rødal wrote:
Yep, having something similar to AlmostEqualUlpsAndAbs() would be great.
I've had some ideas of making qFuzzyCompare work that way in the past,
but gave them up due to not wanting to risk subtly breaking a lot of
existing code.
I would like to propose Mitch Curtis for approver status.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,owner:+mitch,n,z
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#dashboard,1001967
Mitch is working in the Digia Oslo office. In last few months he contributed
more then 100 patches in different areas; mainly in
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Jedrzej Nowacki jedrzej.nowa...@digia.com
wrote:
I would like to propose Mitch Curtis for approver status.
I am actually quite impressed, how he is continuously hunting down the bugs!
Keep up the good spirit! ;)
+1 from my side.
Zeno
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:50:17AM +0400, Denis Shienkov wrote:
30.11.2012, 02:31, Lincoln Ramsay a1291...@gmail.com:
docs_target.commands = $$set QTDOC=$$QTDOC $$QDOC3 $$QDOCCONF
Also this solution on Windows does not work either. I already checked... When
is this solution, Makefile
Qt Project Security Advisory
Title:QML XmlHttpRequest Insecure Redirection
Risk Rating: Low
Platforms:All
Modules: QtQuick1, QtDeclarative
Versions: 4.8.3 and previous
Author: Richard J. Moore r...@kde.org
Date: 17 November 2012
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:47:47PM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
* master:
Only binary compatible changes are allowed into this branch, as it'll be
merged to dev later on.
i would suggest that the assumed merge target is stable until a weeks
or two after the branching - many already posted
Sure he did, but in the context of naming a concern is easy to respond to
with
a counter argument. For example it makes the other branches look like
they're
not subject to testing.
Perhaps, I was unclear. I think he raised a valid concern about the
stable name, but that does not mean I
Hello!
I would like to nominate Orgad Shaneh for the role as maintainer of the
ClearCase plugin in Qt Creator.
We merged a patch yesterday removing the experimental tag from the
ClearCase plugin, so it is time to nominate a maintainer for it. Orgad
has originally written this plugin and has
On 11/30/2012 09:51 AM, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
On Friday 30. November 2012 09.23.32 Samuel Rødal wrote:
Yep, having something similar to AlmostEqualUlpsAndAbs() would be great.
I've had some ideas of making qFuzzyCompare work that way in the past,
but gave them up due to not wanting to risk
Hello,
I take the blame for breaking the qtwebkit build by merging the
QQuickItem::pos() API change, and fully agree with Simon that a good way
to prevent these issues in the future is to send a notice to the mailing
list about SIC changes.
We're now trying to get
On 11/30/2012 02:06 PM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
Hello,
I take the blame for breaking the qtwebkit build by merging the
QQuickItem::pos() API change, and fully agree with Simon that a good way
to prevent these issues in the future is to send a notice to the mailing
list about SIC changes.
We're
On 11/30/2012 02:15 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Sergio Ahumada
sergio.ahum...@digia.com wrote:
I wonder if these should be documented under dist/changes-5.0.0 ?
Well, this specific example is removal of API added within 5.0.0,
isn't it? So I don't see why it
Oswald,
I do not understand how qtPrepareTool() can help me? (We are talking about and
not Qt4.8.x Qt5.0.x)
This function only sets the variable QDOC to the \bin\ qdoc3.exe but me needed
set another variable QTDOC to environment!
I'm create nev file my.prf and copy to qtAddToolEnv function,
Hi,
After yesterdays release we are planning to bump the Qt 4 version to 4.8.5.
The actual change is https://codereview.qt-project.org/41333
Cheers,
--
Sergio Ahumada
Release Engineer - Digia, Qt
___
Development mailing list
Hi,
Anyone knows if QRegExp supports positive/negative lookbehind or not with
Qt5 beta 2? I tried with lookahead which is supported, but I am not sure
about lookbehind.
Thanks.
Victor
Ce message, ainsi que tous les fichiers joints à ce message,
peuvent contenir des informations sensibles
I have just read that gstreamer now works on android. I suppose that this
is a good news for Qt video/Audio decoding on android ?
http://www.fluendo.com/press/gstreamer-sdk-now-offers-support-developing-multimedia-playback-android/
___
Development
Use QRegularExpression in Qt5 then you get full PCRE.
Cheers
Rich.
On 30 November 2012 19:17, victor...@legrand.com.cn wrote:
Hi,
Anyone knows if QRegExp supports positive/negative lookbehind or not with
Qt5 beta 2? I tried with lookahead which is supported, but I am not sure
about
On Nov 24, 2012, at 12:09 PM, Nurmi J-P jpnu...@digia.com wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks to QStyleFactory and QProxyStyle, it is possible to instantiate and
customize any available style. This is not limited to the built-in styles in
QtWidgets, but also works fine for any style plugin since it
On sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2012 11.43.19, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Perhaps, I was unclear. I think he raised a valid concern about the
stable name, but that does not mean I support testing.
No, he didn't. His logic was flawed (as often his arguments are).
He said:
A release is implicitly
On sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2012 12.17.46, victor...@legrand.com.cn
wrote:
Hi,
Anyone knows if QRegExp supports positive/negative lookbehind or not with
Qt5 beta 2? I tried with lookahead which is supported, but I am not sure
about lookbehind.
QRegExp in Qt 5 supports exactly the
23 matches
Mail list logo
