On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
On 22.08.2013 21:51, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2013 21:26:15, Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
I have patches (linked in the bug) to amend this, and I
On Friday 23. August 2013 09.24.54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
On 22.08.2013 21:51, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2013 21:26:15, Antti Kaijanmäki
On 23 August 2013 09:24, Albert Astals Cid albert.ast...@canonical.com wrote:
Also i don't understand that P1 rule for stable, what's the rationale to not
fixing bugs in stable? That's what stable branch is for, no?
I could understand P1 rule for release, but for stable, what if i fix a
On Friday 23 August 2013 09:48:26 Simon Hausmann wrote:
On Friday 23. August 2013 09.24.54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
On 22.08.2013 21:51, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On
On Friday 23. August 2013 10.04.35 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 09:48:26 Simon Hausmann wrote:
On Friday 23. August 2013 09.24.54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaijanmäki
On Friday 23 August 2013 09:24:54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 22:18:54 Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
On 22.08.2013 21:51, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quinta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2013 21:26:15, Antti Kaijanmäki
On Friday 23 August 2013 10:24:01 Simon Hausmann wrote:
On Friday 23. August 2013 10.04.35 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 09:48:26 Simon Hausmann wrote:
On Friday 23. August 2013 09.24.54 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 07:50:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
Hi,
I looked into the desired workflow changes for Jira (as discussed on this list)
and am doing some general cleanups which I would like to bring up at this
point. The more invasive bulk changes will happen on Monday while others have
already happened. Please note that this may temporarily
On 08/23/2013 10:36 AM, Blasche Alexander wrote:
2.) The QTJIRA project had a very inappropriate workflow and permission set.
It was updated to carry the new Qt Bug workflow already. From now on it has
the same setup as every other project. The only difference is that the
project will not
On Aug 23, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Olivier Goffart oliv...@woboq.com
wrote:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,62948
is linked to a bug without categorization
This one went to stable because
- crash/infinite loop fix
- trivial patch for a corner case
- fix for new functionality.
I don't
2013/8/23 Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 08:39:15PM +, Tomasz Olszak wrote:
Let's Suppose that we have 2 different targets (ARM,MIPS) and we want
develop on Windows, Mac and linux 64/32 bit. If I am provider of Qt cross
compiled binaries for ARM
I looked into the desired workflow changes for Jira (as discussed on this
list)
and am doing some general cleanups which I would like to bring up at this
point. The more invasive bulk changes will happen on Monday while others
have already happened. Please note that this may temporarily
On 08/23/2013 10:36 AM, Blasche Alexander wrote:
Hi,
I looked into the desired workflow changes for Jira (as discussed on this
list) and am doing some general cleanups which I would like to bring up at
this point. The more invasive bulk changes will happen on Monday while others
have
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:40:55AM +0200, Tomasz Olszak wrote:
2013/8/23 Oswald Buddenhagen oswald.buddenha...@digia.com
the blackberries asked me the same question a few days ago ...
If it was on ML, I didn't spot it then - sorry.
it was private, otherwise my whole reply would have been a
On sexta-feira, 23 de agosto de 2013 13:09:50, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
but what you really want is dropping the host tool build from the
x-build and using a pre-built host build of qt instead. that is easy to
build into configure, but hard to make useful, because the tools were
never
On 23/08/13 12:59, Blasche Alexander wrote:
Hi Robin,
I am not sure whether you are aware of
http://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/qlogger
It is pretty much what you describe. It was even close to a merge into qtcore
already (only rejected due to feature freeze). It gives you a complete
On 24/08/13 00:24, Philip Ashmore wrote:
On 23/08/13 12:59, Blasche Alexander wrote:
Hi Robin,
I am not sure whether you are aware of
http://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/qlogger
It is pretty much what you describe. It was even close to a merge into
qtcore already (only rejected due to
17 matches
Mail list logo
