Hey there,
We are currently making the QStateMachine QML-ready by amending all the QSM-
related classes (derived from QAbstractState, QAbstractTransition) and adding
Q_PROPERTYs macro where needed. You can see a list of already merged changes
here [1].
All of this work in qtbase is supposed to
Hi,
We have now released Qt Enterprise Embedded on top of Qt 5.3.1 and Virtual
Keyboard 1.1.
More details can be found from blog posts:
Qt Enterprise Embedded:
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/07/03/introducing-android-injection-with-qt-enterprise-embedded-5-3-1/
Virtual Keyboard:
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
On Thursday 03 July 2014 10:48:46 Sze Howe Koh wrote:
Hello,
A user has discovered that the online installer only gives a Qt 5.3
option [1], which doesn't let us install Qt 5.3.0 instead of Qt
Hi,
2014-06-27 15:55 GMT+03:00 Zeno Albisser zeno.albis...@digia.com:
Hi,
We are currently developing Qt WebEngine as a qt-labs project.
Now we would like Qt WebEngine to become an official Qt add-on module.
I am therefore requesting to move the repository from: qt-labs/qtwebengine
to
Hello,
in my work on QtWebChannel I am hitting a problem. For proper integration into
QtWebKit/QtWebEngine, I need access to the QML API of QWebChannel. I could of
course simply add that to the public interface of the C++ QWebChannel library,
but that sounds ugly and afaik one does not do
Hi,
as a result of internal discussions at Digia, I have updated
http://qt-project.org/wiki/ReportingBugsInQt a bit. The motivation
behind this is that we want the bug reports as good as possible since
many roles in the Qt project deal with them (developers, code reviewers,
release managers,
Hi Olivier,
it took some time to recompile everything but it now works!
Thank you very much for this valuable hint.
Best regards
Hauke
Am 02.07.2014 18:24, schrieb Olivier Goffart:
On Wednesday 02 July 2014 18:00:29 Hauke Krüger wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have created a mexFunction that allows
On 2014-07-03, Milian Wolff milian.wo...@kdab.com wrote:
I imagine, it could work by create just a normal library but not install and
public headers, only private ones. That should be OK then, or what do you
think?
We have too many private headers already. We should work on getting rid
of
On Thursday 03 July 2014 10:35:30 Koehne Kai wrote:
Right, the files are still there. But to allow parallel installation (which
is probably what you want if you e.g. are after regression testing) we'd
need to repackage the old Qt 5.3.0 binaries , giving it a new installation
path, changing Qt
Overall this is very good, but there are a couple of things that could be
improved:
- Asking people for a unit test in the bug tracker when we're not allowed
to include this in Qt without submission via gerrit seems likely to cause
conflict. I'd suggest either removing this section or explaining
It's certainly possible, but I'm not sure whether it's really worth
it, given that we still have offline installers.
Is it possible to use the offline installer to install 5.3.0 into the existing
installation and not install a new Qt Creator?
[ ]
No. Installer does not check for
11 matches
Mail list logo
