On Jul 16, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Poenitz Andre andre.poen...@digia.com wrote:
Olivier Goffart wrote:
Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
[...]
What is wrong with string - int or bytearray - int?
At the very least, _implicit_ conversions should not lose data,
i.e. a A a1; B b = a1; A a2 = b; round trip
Hello,
Does anybody succeed to play webkit2/qt5.3.1 on any EGLFS platform? I
failed on two (one mips, one arm) . As I dig more, I found two issues, both
SIGBUS on QtWebProcess . The first one, i created a dirty patch, you can
see [1] . Any suggestions/comments of this patch is appreciated,
On Thursday 17 July 2014 10:27:39 Dennis Luehring wrote:
these new builtins allows clang to optimize operator new/delete
operations far better then before
__builtin_operator_new
__builtin_operator_delete
patches in review for clang 3.5
clang: http://reviews.llvm.org/rL210137
libc++:
On Thursday 17 of July 2014 10:51:03 you wrote:
QVariant::operator== is not symmetric
QDateTime dateTime = QDateTime::currentDateTime();
QTime time = dateTime.time();
qDebug() (QVariant(dateTime) == QVariant(time));
qDebug() (QVariant(time) == QVariant(dateTime));
--
Hello together,
in KDE I reverse my scrolling and all applications use the reversed scrolling,
only those who are build with my build (5.3.1) of Qt are using the native
scrolling of my system. If I build my applications with the prebuild libraries
scrolling is working, the way its configured
On Thursday 17 Jul 2014 13:28:10 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
On Thursday 17 of July 2014 10:51:03 you wrote:
QVariant::operator== is not symmetric
QDateTime dateTime = QDateTime::currentDateTime();
QTime time = dateTime.time();
qDebug() (QVariant(dateTime) ==
On Thursday 17 July 2014 13:33:49 Daniel Teske wrote:
A equals operator that is not symetric is broken. Such a class cannot be
reliably used in std nor qt containers. Or do you know which way around,
QList::contains uses the equals operation?
Note that none of the class which have a member
On Thursday 17 of July 2014 13:33:49 Daniel Teske wrote:
On Thursday 17 Jul 2014 13:28:10 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
On Thursday 17 of July 2014 10:51:03 you wrote:
QVariant::operator== is not symmetric
QDateTime dateTime = QDateTime::currentDateTime();
QTime time =
On Sunday 06 July 2014 23:55:14 BogDan wrote:
[..]
I presume that changing the semantics here (i.e. triggering
QAbstractState::onExited when the machine is stopped) isn't appropriate,
as it may break existing applications, but I'm not exactly sure.
I think it would be far less risk of
On Jul 17, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Jędrzej Nowacki jedrzej.nowa...@digia.com wrote:
On Thursday 17 of July 2014 13:33:49 Daniel Teske wrote:
On Thursday 17 Jul 2014 13:28:10 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
On Thursday 17 of July 2014 10:51:03 you wrote:
QVariant::operator== is not symmetric
On Jul 17, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Jędrzej Nowacki jedrzej.nowa...@digia.com wrote:
On Thursday 17 of July 2014 10:51:03 you wrote:
QVariant::operator== is not symmetric
QDateTime dateTime = QDateTime::currentDateTime();
QTime time = dateTime.time();
qDebug() (QVariant(dateTime) ==
On Thursday 17 July 2014 12:20:56 Olivier Goffart wrote:
But Qt don't use custom allocators. According to grep, the only place where
operator new is used directly in Qt is QSharedPointer[2]. And I believe
it is better to change the code to call the normal new. (I'm not sure why
it's done this
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 02:36:22PM +0200, Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Thursday 17 July 2014 13:33:49 Daniel Teske wrote:
A equals operator that is not symetric is broken. Such a class cannot be
reliably used in std nor qt containers. Or do you know which way around,
QList::contains uses the
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 02:38:40PM +0200, Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
On Thursday 17 of July 2014 13:33:49 Daniel Teske wrote:
On Thursday 17 Jul 2014 13:28:10 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
On Thursday 17 of July 2014 10:51:03 you wrote:
QVariant::operator== is not symmetric
QDateTime
14 matches
Mail list logo
