On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Thiago Macieira
thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On Friday 08 May 2015 16:10:27 Hausmann Simon wrote:
Hi,
Compilation wise I agree, it's low effort. But the situation is different in
Jira IMO.
Can we declare the module in Deprecated state and keep bug
I got a question from a kolourpaint user (KDE painting program) why he can not
see
the same fonts he finds in e.g. libreoffice.
Checking my own system (openSuse 13.2), I see some differences where I hope
someone here can answer
why Qt does list some fonts.
E.g. fc-list finds also these fonts
On Saturday May 09 2015 13:26:49 Martin Koller wrote:
I got a question from a kolourpaint user (KDE painting program) why he can
not see
the same fonts he finds in e.g. libreoffice.
I'm afraid the answer is that Qt's handling of not-so-common font styles and
weights is incomplete, not to
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Turunen Tuukka
tuukka.turu...@theqtcompany.com wrote:
The thing is that since the beginning of Qt 5 we have been constantly
adding things and not removing the parts that are less used (and
deprecated). Even though one might think it takes very little effort to
On Saturday 09 May 2015 16:35:20 Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:Why do people read remove as in you need to stop using it now?
When we're saying remove, we meant only that it's no longer included in
the
On Saturday 09 May 2015 09:31:29 Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Turunen Tuukka
tuukka.turu...@theqtcompany.com wrote:
The thing is that since the beginning of Qt 5 we have been constantly
adding things and not removing the parts that are less used (and
On Saturday 09 May 2015 04:34:45 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
If we keep the state of making almost no fixes, why would it matter if Qt
Quick 1 is not included in the Qt 5.6? Those who need it can take it from
the repository and use with their app, even if we do not include the module
any more in the
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
wrote:Why do people read remove as in you need to stop using it now?
When we're saying remove, we meant only that it's no longer included in
the
convenience big tarball and in the binary releases. If you still need it,
On 8-5-2015 18:47, Hausmann Simon wrote:
Hi,
If the public API would allow you to implement what the folks at KDAB did at
http://www.kdab.com/creating-pdf-qtquick-2-scene-slideviewer/ , would that
help your use case?
What they basicaly did was reimplement the Quick elements they were
