Hi Edi,
On Friday 24 July 2015 05:11:40 Edi Anderson wrote:
I have time available and just need
someone to tell me what to do and how to start.
Andrew told you already how to start.
As for what to do: Where do your interests lie?
Would you like to work on a new feature you have in mind? You
On 23/07/15 19:16, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote:
On Thursday 23 July 2015 19:22:46 Marc Mutz wrote:
I believe we should strive to have the LTS release warning-free in this
regard. It's going to be in use for a long time, and the demand for
nullptr-
correctness will only grow
Or do you want to help improve the C++11 support in Qt?
Is there a TODO list about possible improvements?
And what's the policy about C++14? Isn't C++14 mostly
a patch/cleanup of C++11?
Or...
Thanks,
Marc
--
Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB
Von: Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
Mixing different Qt versions in the same process is not supported. I must
point
out that none of the backtraces in either link show this.
You can't use plugins compiled with an older Qt version.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349371
I
On Friday 24 July 2015 10:30:32 Peter Kuemmel wrote:
Or do you want to help improve the C++11 support in Qt?
Is there a TODO list about possible improvements?
And what's the policy about C++14? Isn't C++14 mostly
a patch/cleanup of C++11?
List: we have the list from Thiago, which I asked
On Thursday 23 July 2015 16:29:12 Knoll Lars wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:27, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2015 23:33:34 Thiago Macieira wrote:
* Q_DECL_OVERRIDE - required in new code, don't add to old code
- Required to be used consistently within a class, because
On 24/07/15 13:34, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote:
On Thursday 23 July 2015 16:29:12 Knoll Lars wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:27, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2015 23:33:34 Thiago Macieira wrote:
* Q_DECL_OVERRIDE - required in new code, don't add to old code
-
On Friday 24 July 2015 10:36:19 Peter Kuemmel wrote:
Von: Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com
Mixing different Qt versions in the same process is not supported. I must
point out that none of the backtraces in either link show this.
You can't use plugins compiled with an older
On Friday 24 July 2015 13:34:39 Marc Mutz wrote:
On Thursday 23 July 2015 16:29:12 Knoll Lars wrote:
On 23/07/15 14:27, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2015 23:33:34 Thiago Macieira wrote:
* Q_DECL_OVERRIDE - required in new code, don't add to old code
-
On Friday 24 July 2015 20:23:45 Marc Mutz wrote:
itself by a grass roots movement and b) people will a not-too-unrealistic
s/people will//
--
Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt
On Friday 24 July 2015 17:43:59 Thiago Macieira wrote:
So the question is only whether we want to add the macro now and replace
with the keyword in 5.7.
I'd say no.
Fair enough, but seeing all the commits flying by that add Q_D_O to fix
warnings with clang, it's not hard to imagine that a)
On Friday 24 July 2015 20:23:45 Marc Mutz wrote:
Fair enough, but seeing all the commits flying by that add Q_D_O to fix
warnings with clang, it's not hard to imagine that a) the problem will
solve itself by a grass roots movement and b) people will a
not-too-unrealistic future warning will
On Friday 24 July 2015 15:26:30 Gerhard Scheikl wrote:
Hi
Unfortunately, the QtXml classes contain a lot of bugs and are not really
maintained.
Hello Gerhard
Your question is answered mostly by your paragraph above: QtXml is in Done
state, so we really don't want to do major surgery in it,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Gerhard Scheikl g.sche...@avibit.com
wrote:
Hi
Unfortunately, the QtXml classes contain a lot of bugs and are not really
maintained.
So we came up with the idea to replace the back-end with Xerces and try to
leave the Qt API part the same.
Hi,
pugixml has
Hi
Unfortunately, the QtXml classes contain a lot of bugs and are not really
maintained.
So we came up with the idea to replace the back-end with Xerces and try to
leave the Qt API part the same.
Has anyone tried such an approach already?
If we succeed, we would like to give this code back to
Rebooting windows is the first thing a windows user learns to do, why it takes
so much to do it ? :)
On Thursday, July 23, 2015 1:05 PM, Friedemann Kleint
friedemann.kle...@theqtcompany.com wrote:
Hi,
As far as I know, no. No one has a clue why the creation of a temporary
16 matches
Mail list logo
