Re: [Development] Use of Standard Library containers in Qt source code

2016-07-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 7 de julho de 2016 09:10:50 PDT Marc Mutz wrote: > On Thursday 07 July 2016 03:00:08 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > In case we're not getting the deserved attention due to Summer vacations, > > I'll post again in a month or so to see if there's any change. > > We have The Chief on

Re: [Development] Configurable Maintenance Tool

2016-07-07 Thread Konstantin Podsvirov
Hello, Denis.12:51, 7 jul 2016 г., Denis Shienkov :Hi All,Is it possible to make the Maintenance Tool utility is more configurable? Or, maybe, is it planned in future? e.g. I want to able to add/remove some modules by own choosing:- QtMultimedia- QtConnectivity-

Re: [Development] Use of Standard Library containers in Qt source code

2016-07-07 Thread Marco Bubke
I think it simply a question of time to get used to the STL. You get used to many things. I think we should mind about the new features of C++ which are coming, which cannot integrated very well with Qt because we use a different idiom. I really think we should make it easier for the

[Development] Configurable Maintenance Tool

2016-07-07 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hi All, Is it possible to make the Maintenance Tool utility is more configurable? Or, maybe, is it planned in future? e.g. I want to able to add/remove some modules by own choosing: - QtMultimedia - QtConnectivity - QtSerialPort and so on.. But, currently the Maintenance Tool does not provide

Re: [Development] Use of Standard Library containers in Qt source code

2016-07-07 Thread Marc Mutz
On Thursday 07 July 2016 09:25:18 Martin Smith wrote: > How about a merger of options 3 & 4 for Qt 6.0? A QtSTL that combines the > ease of use of the Qt collections with the efficiency of STL algorithms. Yes, for Qt 6, a template that takes an STL API and provides the Qt methods on it is

Re: [Development] Use of Standard Library containers in Qt source code

2016-07-07 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Martin Smith wrote: > > How about a merger of options 3 & 4 for Qt 6.0? A QtSTL that combines the > ease of use of the Qt collections with the efficiency of STL algorithms. If anything, why would it need to wait for Qt 6? -- Giuseppe D'Angelo

Re: [Development] Use of Standard Library containers in Qt source code

2016-07-07 Thread Martin Smith
How about a merger of options 3 & 4 for Qt 6.0? A QtSTL that combines the ease of use of the Qt collections with the efficiency of STL algorithms. martin From: Development on behalf of André Somers

Re: [Development] Use of Standard Library containers in Qt source code

2016-07-07 Thread André Somers
Op 07/07/2016 om 09:10 schreef Marc Mutz: On Thursday 07 July 2016 03:00:08 Thiago Macieira wrote: In case we're not getting the deserved attention due to Summer vacations, I'll post again in a month or so to see if there's any change. We have The Chief on record saying that we should use

Re: [Development] Use of Standard Library containers in Qt source code

2016-07-07 Thread Marc Mutz
On Thursday 07 July 2016 03:00:08 Thiago Macieira wrote: > In case we're not getting the deserved attention due to Summer vacations, > I'll post again in a month or so to see if there's any change. We have The Chief on record saying that we should use whatever is most efficient internally