Re: [Development] Remember to rebuild qmake in dev

2016-07-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 21 de julho de 2016 20:23:19 PDT Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:27:58AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > moc.prf with MSVC now depends on a side feature in qmake to help support > > generating the moc_predefs.h file. If you're using MSVC, please remember >

Re: [Development] Remember to rebuild qmake in dev

2016-07-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 21 de julho de 2016 18:02:51 PDT Mitch Curtis wrote: > It's probably worth pointing out what kind of errors we can expect should we > forget (so that we can recognise the problem). The moc_predefs.h file contains qmake's help output, as opposed to a valid C source file. Since

Re: [Development] Revisiting high-DPI configuration options

2016-07-21 Thread Prav
Hello, Everyone and Thiago. >> SVG icons are not shown at all in static builds of Qt, but png icons are >> fine (both icons are taken from resorse file). Static and shred Qt 5.6.1 >> build were done with same config settings except of cause "static". > Remember to force the inclusion of the svg

Re: [Development] Remember to rebuild qmake in dev

2016-07-21 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:27:58AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > moc.prf with MSVC now depends on a side feature in qmake to help support > generating the moc_predefs.h file. If you're using MSVC, please remember to > recompile qmake soon. > a much better recommendation is "run config.status

Re: [Development] Remember to rebuild qmake in dev

2016-07-21 Thread Mitch Curtis
It's probably worth pointing out what kind of errors we can expect should we forget (so that we can recognise the problem). From: Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira

[Development] Remember to rebuild qmake in dev

2016-07-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
Hello moc.prf with MSVC now depends on a side feature in qmake to help support generating the moc_predefs.h file. If you're using MSVC, please remember to recompile qmake soon. This does not affect GCC (any OS) or the Intel compiler (any OS), as both support the "dump macros" hidden feature.

Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active?

2016-07-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 21 de julho de 2016 17:05:42 PDT Prav wrote: > But this field is CHANGEBLE! So Fix Version SHOULD NOT BE KNOWN. It is how > maintainer see planning of it currently. That is not how we use the bug tracker, as I've explained. The rest of your email is not relevant. -- Thiago

Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active?

2016-07-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 21 de julho de 2016 10:20:59 PDT Prav wrote: > Hello, Everyone. > > > Bugs are fixed when they are fixed. You won't get any estimate before the > > developer actually starts fixing the issue. And even then, it may take > > months or more until it actually gets fixed. > > Agree

Re: [Development] Stack Overflow Documentation

2016-07-21 Thread André Somers
Op 21/07/2016 om 16:35 schreef Sze Howe Koh: On 21 July 2016 at 19:04, Mitch Curtis wrote: Hello. Stack Overflow Documentation is now in Beta. You can read more about it here: http://stackoverflow.com/tour/documentation It is much more accessible than our contribution

Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active?

2016-07-21 Thread Robin Burchell
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016, at 04:05 PM, Prav wrote: > Agree with you if this field was unchangeable once it was set (nobody > knows the future exactly ... ). > But this field is CHANGEBLE! So Fix Version SHOULD NOT BE KNOWN. It is > how maintainer see planning of it currently. Looking at my current

Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active?

2016-07-21 Thread Mitch Curtis
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Prav > Sent: Thursday, 21 July 2016 4:06 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active? > > Hello,

Re: [Development] Stack Overflow Documentation

2016-07-21 Thread Sze Howe Koh
On 21 July 2016 at 19:04, Mitch Curtis wrote: > Hello. > > Stack Overflow Documentation is now in Beta. You can read more about it here: > > http://stackoverflow.com/tour/documentation > > It is much more accessible than our contribution system, so I see a lot of >

Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active?

2016-07-21 Thread Mitch Curtis
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+mitch.curtis=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Prav > Sent: Thursday, 21 July 2016 1:32 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active? > > Hello,

Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active?

2016-07-21 Thread Prav
Hello, Everyone. > If you want this bug fixed, or to improve the QtMM quality there are far > better ways: > - Get a Qt support license from the Qt Company and raise the issue > to them. They very often help raising important customer issues like > this one to P1 since in the end, it's that

[Development] Ynt: Boot to Qt Device problem.

2016-07-21 Thread Bahadır Can
I can't check if the uboot is too old because board can't boot itself when i use flashboot image of Qt. So I can't update uboot from sd card too. It does nothing basically. Also uboot is working at yocto images if it shows it is okay. Gönderen: Bahadır Can

[Development] Stack Overflow Documentation

2016-07-21 Thread Mitch Curtis
Hello. Stack Overflow Documentation is now in Beta. You can read more about it here: http://stackoverflow.com/tour/documentation It is much more accessible than our contribution system, so I see a lot of documentation/example contributions going there instead of to Gerrit. I also wonder if we

Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active?

2016-07-21 Thread Prav
Hello, Everyone. >> So while I agree that angriness is not helpful for mail list ... messages >> like this >> are probably the seed to rethink strategy of working with bugs. > Somewhat a side remark, but the unfortunate consequence of this thinking is > that the objectively best way to get a

Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] [Windows] Qt Versions/Kit auto-detection doesn't work on snapshots

2016-07-21 Thread Prav
Title: Re: [Qt-creator] [Windows] Qt Versions/Kit auto-detection doesn't work on snapshots Hello, Julius. I noticed a strange behavior on snapshots for a while now. Neither Qt versions nor kits are detected at all. With Creator 4.0.x, everything works perfectly (Qt 5.6.1 & Qt 5.7, MinGW

Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active?

2016-07-21 Thread Jocelyn Turcotte
> On 21 Jul 2016, at 11:01, Denis Shienkov wrote: > > @ Thiago, > > >The one you linked to is P2 - Important. It's neither critical nor > showstopper. > > It isn't I did the decision about assigning the P2 status. I personally would > establish P0/P1 if it would

Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active?

2016-07-21 Thread Denis Shienkov
@ Thiago, >The one you linked to is P2 - Important. It's neither critical nor showstopper. It isn't I did the decision about assigning the P2 status. I personally would establish P0/P1 if it would make sense (but, it is just "empty work" which won't change anything). Since many bugs with P1

Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active?

2016-07-21 Thread Kai Koehne
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > [...] > So while I agree that angriness is not helpful for mail list ... messages > like this > are probably the seed to rethink strategy of working with bugs. Somewhat a side remark, but the

Re: [Development] [QtMultimedia] Still is supported, active?

2016-07-21 Thread Prav
Hello, Everyone. > Bugs are fixed when they are fixed. You won't get any estimate before the > developer actually starts fixing the issue. And even then, it may take months > or more until it actually gets fixed. Agree but devil is in details. Currently there is a practice to not fill-out

Re: [Development] Documenting 3rd party code Qt

2016-07-21 Thread Kai Koehne
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:57 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Documenting 3rd party code Qt > > On quarta-feira,

Re: [Development] Are QT winmigrate framework will be back in qt 5.x ?

2016-07-21 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
A lot of it will depend on what you are using Qt for. I used the Qt Solution for WinMigrate, which essentially (At a very high level) makes sure the Qt event loop gets called when the MFC event loop is run. Where I used it was to add Qt windows and Qt eventloop driven functionality (QHttp

Re: [Development] Are QT winmigrate framework will be back in qt 5.x ?

2016-07-21 Thread techabc
How can I reuse the MFC based GUI dll in a QT application? 2016-06-26 21:53 GMT+08:00 techabc : > I need to call 300+ MFC extending DLL in a new QT 5.x application, if > except winmigrate, whatthing else can do it? > ___ Development