Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from 'dev' to '5.8' ongoing, Qt 5.8 Feature Freeze coming...

2016-08-16 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi all, We have still issues with qt5.git integration in 'dev' and some configuration system related changes are missing as well. That's why we agreed to postpone final branching () a bit in today's release team meeting (memo coming later). New target is Monday 22nd August 2016. Please do not

Re: [Development] Which changes are suitable for 5.6?

2016-08-16 Thread Jędrzej Nowacki
On fredag 12. august 2016 10.52.52 CEST Marc Mutz wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to know what the rules are supposed to for submitting to 5.6 (LTS). > > Should we enforce the strict rules of other minor releases (only regressions > and P2+)? I strongly believe that autotests improvements should go to

Re: [Development] Which changes are suitable for 5.6?

2016-08-16 Thread Marc Mutz
On Tuesday 16 August 2016 10:06:09 Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Freitag, 12. August 2016 09:02:08 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: [...] > > I agree with Marc, we should allow fixing bugs besides those that are > > critical or regressions. Even the regression category will change: once > > 5.6 is a year

Re: [Development] Which changes are suitable for 5.6?

2016-08-16 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Freitag, 12. August 2016 09:02:08 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 12 de agosto de 2016 14:00:10 PDT Marc Mutz wrote: > > Well, we told people "look, Qt 5.7 will drop support for your platform, > > and > > require C++11, but don't worry: you have 5.6 LTS". I doubt those people > >