I didn't find time to have a more detailed look at the code so far, but hope to
get to it over the weekend.
But in general I think we need to put the bars for becoming a TP at the right
level. It's not a fully supported module yet, and we put it out especially to
collect feedback. So it
On 1/11/17, 11:50 AM, "Development on behalf of Oswald Buddenhagen"
wrote:
>> >but my naive understanding of rpc implementations is that you actually
>> >want to create some idl (is this what .rep is
On 01/10/2017 06:46 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote:
Greetings,
To go back on the main subject, it came to my attention that Apple is
using mostly "Automatic Reference Counting" since 2011:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_Reference_Counting
The good news is it's not using the GC which makes
> -Original Message-
> From: Development [mailto:development-
> bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Oswald
> Buddenhagen
> Sent: keskiviikkona 11. tammikuuta 2017 18.50
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Switch Qt Remote Objects to a Tech
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:42:38AM +, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote:
> I guess to start off, I don’t consider QtRO to be a RPC mechanism.
> In my mind, RPC would be akin to exposing a QObject’s slots for calling
> individually. With QtRO (which only works Qt to Qt, it isn’t currently
>
Lars Knoll:
> plan sounds good, just go ahead :)
I've opened QTBUG-58083 for the sake of tracking it.
Anyone with further comments is welcome to look there.
On IRC, peppe has pointed out using L may get narrowing warnings from some
compilers.
So I'll start with using M_PI and Math.PI more
Hi Eddy,
plan sounds good, just go ahead :)
Cheers,
Lars
> On 11 Jan 2017, at 15:35, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the course of testing 5.8.0, I was puzzled by an example hard-coding
> a value for pi, rather than re-using one from some public header as I
Hi all,
In the course of testing 5.8.0, I was puzzled by an example hard-coding
a value for pi, rather than re-using one from some public header as I
expected. To my surprise, the standard library only provides M_PI as a
POSIX extension. It turns out we do have a qmath.h that, sensibly
enough,
On 1/11/17, 4:43 AM, "m...@kdab.com on behalf of Marc Mutz" wrote:
>Hi Brett,
>
>On Wednesday 11 January 2017 01:42:38 Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote:
>> With this picture in mind, the key to getting it to work is to hook into
>> qt_metacall and
Hello,
I developed a patch to qt's core module to remove the necessity to have
an unused base file when only loading variants of the file using the
QFileSelector.
I am looking for someone with knowledge in QFileSelector to review my
patch on gerrit:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/175376/
Hi Brett,
On Wednesday 11 January 2017 01:42:38 Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote:
> With this picture in mind, the key to getting it to work is to hook into
> qt_metacall and pass the invocations between processes. This takes custom
> code, so QtRO has repc (REPlica Compiler) for this. It reads
On 1/10/17, 7:42 PM, "Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.)" wrote:
>On 1/10/17, 7:11 AM, "Development on behalf of Oswald Buddenhagen"
>oswald.buddenha...@qt.io> wrote:
>
>>you mostly lost me here, because i just
Hi
We have new Qt 5.8.0 rc snapshot for testing
Windows: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.8/5.8.0-rc/720/
mac: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.8/5.8.0-rc/726/
Linux: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.8/5.8.0-rc/622/
src: http://download.qt.io/snapshots/qt/5.8/5.8.0-rc/latest_src/
13 matches
Mail list logo