Re: [Development] V8 integration

2017-01-24 Thread Simon Hausmann
Hi, In Qt 5.1 we are still using V8. To change a later version of Qt to use V8 is very hard, yes. Simon From: Dmitriy - Sent: Jan 25, 2017 08:56 To: Simon Hausmann Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] V8 integration But Is it very hard t

Re: [Development] V8 integration

2017-01-24 Thread Dmitriy -
But Is it very hard to change qt5 js engine to v8 (5.1)? On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote: > Hi, > > I'm afraid that is not possible. > > > Simon > > > -- > *From:* Dmitriy - > *Sent:* Jan 25, 2017 07:31 > *To:* development@qt-project.org > *Subj

Re: [Development] V8 integration

2017-01-24 Thread Simon Hausmann
Hi, I'm afraid that is not possible. Simon From: Dmitriy - Sent: Jan 25, 2017 07:31 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] V8 integration Hello Qt developers. I know that Qt uses V4 engine as a primary JavaScript engine, but Does it still pos

[Development] V8 integration

2017-01-24 Thread Dmitriy -
Hello Qt developers. I know that Qt uses V4 engine as a primary JavaScript engine, but Does it still possible to use V8 and build qt with it? -- Regards, Dmitry Bezheckov. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.8.0 and Qt Creator 4.2.1 released

2017-01-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em terça-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2017, às 22:01:49 PST, Gunnar Roth escreveu: > > No. There will be a 5.6.2, but not another 5.7.x. > > Well, there IS already a 5.6.2 version. Ok, so there will be a 5.6.3. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Sou

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.8.0 and Qt Creator 4.2.1 released

2017-01-24 Thread Gunnar Roth
>> > > No. There will be a 5.6.2, but not another 5.7.x. Well, there IS already a 5.6.2 version. Regals, Gunnar Roth ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 feature freeze

2017-01-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em terça-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2017, às 08:29:42 PST, mark diener escreveu: > Jani: > > Qt shipped 5.8.0. Qt Lite shipped. Nice Job. > > Maybe Qt should actually define "Feature Freeze" as the following: > > Qt will now FREEZE new development and task dev staff 100% for 2 > months to clean out

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Change file process & improvement proposal

2017-01-24 Thread Kai Koehne
> -Original Message- > > [...] > > I therefore suggest to implement Jani's suggestions for the time > > being. If we find out they're not effective, we can always come back > > and look into alternative processes. > > > > 1. Enable [ChangeLog] tag in commit template > > > > https://coderevi

Re: [Development] Change file process & improvement proposal

2017-01-24 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 03:38:11PM +0100, Edward Welbourne wrote: > > Proposal: Check for [ChangeLog] entries in a 5.x branch _after 5.x.0 > > branched_. Is that easy to enable/disable? > > It should be easy to detect that 5.x.0 "has branched" - check for > existence of either origin/5.x.0 branch

Re: [Development] Change file process & improvement proposal

2017-01-24 Thread Edward Welbourne
> Proposal: Check for [ChangeLog] entries in a 5.x branch _after 5.x.0 > branched_. Is that easy to enable/disable? It should be easy to detect that 5.x.0 "has branched" - check for existence of either origin/5.x.0 branch or v5.x.0 tag. That we're committing to 5.x is fairly easy *in Gerrit* (wi

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 feature freeze

2017-01-24 Thread mark diener
Jani: Qt shipped 5.8.0. Qt Lite shipped. Nice Job. Maybe Qt should actually define "Feature Freeze" as the following: Qt will now FREEZE new development and task dev staff 100% for 2 months to clean out all the bugs that are P2 important and up and get caught up on bug fixing. At the end of 2 m

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Change file process & improvement proposal

2017-01-24 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
On tirsdag 24. januar 2017 12.00.40 CET Kai Koehne wrote: > Looks like this discussion got stuck before reaching a conclusion ... > > > -Original Message- > > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > > project.org] On Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen > > Sent: Thurs

Re: [Development] Change file process & improvement proposal

2017-01-24 Thread Kai Koehne
Looks like this discussion got stuck before reaching a conclusion ... > -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:23 PM > To: development@qt-project.org; relea

Re: [Development] invokeMethod() with function pointers

2017-01-24 Thread Benjamin TERRIER
Hi, I'd like to get this in before 5.9 FF. The current state is: - It works for member functions, function pointers and functors - It soft breaks existing code that were passing null literals. - The new functions do not accepts any arguments, users have to use lambda - The new functions do ac

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 feature freeze

2017-01-24 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi all, Only one week left. And we should start soft branching from 'dev' to '5.9' already tomorrow & finalize it 1.2.2017 to be able to have the FF as planned. Please update new features page as soon as possible; https://wiki.qt.io/New_Features_in_Qt_5.9 is quite empty still... br, Jani