Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

2017-02-17 Thread Tuukka Turunen
From: Development on behalf of Roland Winklmeier Date: Friday, 17 February 2017 at 12.20 To: "development@qt-project.org" Subject: Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9

Re: [Development] QMacCocoaViewContainer changes?

2017-02-17 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Friday February 17 2017 13:55:34 Timur Pocheptsov wrote: > Do you have a smaller reproducer for this? Something not as big as designer > or vlc? Sorry, no. Not yet at least. First thing I tried was releasing the native view in the QMacCocoaViewContainer example, but that doesn't cause a

Re: [Development] QMacCocoaViewContainer changes?

2017-02-17 Thread Timur Pocheptsov
Do you have a smaller reproducer for this? Something not as big as designer or vlc? Best regards, Timur. From: René J.V. Bertin Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 2:52:27 PM To: Timur Pocheptsov Cc: development@qt-project.org;

Re: [Development] Decrease amounth of delivered src packages

2017-02-17 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On miércoles, 15 de febrero de 2017 17:29:43 ART Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2017 15:11:49 PST Mathias Hasselmann > > wrote: > > That's a somewhat limited point of view. Yes, xz archives are slightly > > smaller, but to be honest: In the days of 4K video streaming

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

2017-02-17 Thread Roland Winklmeier
Hi Tuukka, 2017-02-16 17:13 GMT+01:00 Tuukka Turunen : > As multiple people and teams have planned their development according to > initially agreed feature freeze time of Qt 5.9, it would be very > inefficient to reopen 5.9 now or postpone getting the release out. > I

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

2017-02-17 Thread Sean Harmer
On Friday 17 February 2017 08:10:55 Alex Blasche wrote: > > [...] > > > > I note that an answer on this is still pending, but as an aside: CI on > > 5.8 (and 5.6) appears to be smooth sailing the last two days. Hardly any > > false failures anymore. > > The CI integration process is only partly

Re: [Development] QMacCocoaViewContainer changes?

2017-02-17 Thread Timur Pocheptsov
Yes, please, provide all the related details in the report. Best regards, Timur. From: René J.V. Bertin Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 10:09:14 AM To: Timur Pocheptsov Cc: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development]

Re: [Development] QMacCocoaViewContainer changes?

2017-02-17 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Friday February 17 2017 08:41:13 Timur Pocheptsov wrote: >qnsview_cast is using Obj-C RTTI. An object with a type inheriting QNSView >will pass isKindOfClass:[QNSView class] test. Doh, yes, of course. In that case the message is probably appropriate though still a bit counterproductive if

Re: [Development] QMacCocoaViewContainer changes?

2017-02-17 Thread Timur Pocheptsov
Ok, don't hesitate to report it. qnsview_cast is using Obj-C RTTI. An object with a type inheriting QNSView will pass isKindOfClass:[QNSView class] test. Best regards, Timur. From: René J.V. Bertin Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017

Re: [Development] QMacCocoaViewContainer changes?

2017-02-17 Thread René J . V . Bertin
On Friday February 17 2017 05:39:44 Timur Pocheptsov wrote: Hello Timur, I was planning to, but after I gather some more observations, to get an idea if indeed the foreign NSView gets released before calling the QMacCocoaViewContainer dtor, and where. I also want to try to get some certainty

Re: [Development] QMacCocoaViewContainer changes?

2017-02-17 Thread Philippe
I observed some change too. In my case, a NSView, created on the client side ("my side"), and inserted inside a Qt hierarchy, is now released automatically by Qt. Before, I had to release this NSView "manually". When switching to Qt 5.8, the NSView was released twice (client + Qt sides), causing a

Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

2017-02-17 Thread Alex Blasche
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Marc Mutz > > Also, to allow others to help with the release process, could you > > explain where the main bottle neck is with the release process please? > > Is