Re: [Development] Focusing bug fixes to 5.9 branch and patch releases during H1/17

2017-02-28 Thread Lars Knoll
Hi, sorry for answering only now to this thread, I was on vacation last week. Let’s conclude this topic now by moving on towards 5.9 as Tuukka proposed. After some thinking I also agree that this is the best course of action from where we are right now. This is certainly not a great

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 alpha & mapbox-gl-native on windows ?

2017-02-28 Thread Thiago Marcos P. Santos
> But what desktop platform (if any) is most stable right now for mapboxgl? We tested it on OSX, Linux (Ubuntu, but CI bot is passing on RHL and Yocto too), iOS and Android. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org

[Development] CI: module "NIL" (NIL)

2017-02-28 Thread Marc Mutz
Hi, Something's wonky with the CI: e.g. https://codereview.qt-project.org/186905 (http://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qtbase/tasks/1488304949) Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel:

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 API review

2017-02-28 Thread Edward Welbourne
Jani Heikkinen (28 February 2017 11:09): > It seems Qt 5.9 API review is still badly ongoing, see [snip] FTR, we have some on-going fixes in progress in qtbase. > Please finalize the reviews & do needed fixes as soon as possible so that we > will be ready for beta early enough. If your module

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 API review

2017-02-28 Thread Sean Harmer
On Tuesday 28 February 2017 10:09:13 Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems Qt 5.9 API review is still badly ongoing, see > https://codereview.qt-project.org/184392qt3d We went through this last week and resulted in: https://bugreports.qt.io/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=48

[Development] Qt 5.9 API review

2017-02-28 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi all, It seems Qt 5.9 API review is still badly ongoing, see https://codereview.qt-project.org/184384qtbase https://codereview.qt-project.org/184385qtsvg https://codereview.qt-project.org/184386qtdeclarative https://codereview.qt-project.org/184387qtactiveqt

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 alpha & mapbox-gl-native on windows ?

2017-02-28 Thread Alexander Ivash
>> but we are unsure if we'll be able to ship the mapboxgl plugin for windows >> with 5.9 Thank you for reply Paolo, will keep fingers crossed then. But what desktop platform (if any) is most stable right now for mapboxgl? Regards, Alexander 2017-02-27 23:11 GMT+03:00 Paolo Angelelli

Re: [Development] Fwd: Qt contributions

2017-02-28 Thread Marco Piccolino
Hi Zoltan, you might also want to take a look at this project which supports admobs, startad.mobi among others: https://github.com/kafeg/adctl Also, we have a Slack chat dedicated to professional Qt mobile application developers that you can join: http://slackin.qtmob.org If your solution is