Re: [Development] List of available Qt mirrors

On 17 May 2017 at 01:36, Li Xu wrote: > hi, > > I got 4 mirrors from the link from China mainland, > > http://mirrors.ustc.edu.cn/qtproject/online/qtsdkrepository/windows_x86/root/qt/Updates.xml > (cn, prio 100) >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 beta4 available

There is also another regression QTBUG-59704 which is still unsolved. -- Oleg Yadrov oleg.yad...@qt.io > On May 16, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Robin Burchell wrote: > > Thanks for the report. I'll take a look at finishing this tonight. > > -- > Robin Burchell >

Re: [Development] Dropping the option to disable QStringBuilder in 5.10?

On Tuesday, 16 May 2017 06:14:39 PDT Marc Mutz wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to suggest to drop the option to disable QStringBuilder-backed op+ > in Qt 5.10. We have been compiling Qt itself with QStringBuilder-backed op+ > and have seen very little breakages (mainly in qmake, with its own string >

Re: [Development] Introducing discussion about QStringFormatter

On segunda-feira, 15 de maio de 2017 05:49:19 PDT Mårten Nordheim wrote: >- Note: To print a curly brace they have to be doubled (same >as in all of the above) ( "{{", "}}" ) Why do we need a double closing curly brace? This is not a valid sequence:

Re: [Development] Introducing discussion about QStringFormatter

On Tue, May 16, 2017, at 07:14 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > I'd prefer we kept the % syntax which we already have, but from the > discussion, it looks like it won't work. We need a syntax that has a > clear > open and close so that more options can be placed inside the placeholder. A potential

Re: [Development] Introducing discussion about QStringFormatter

On terça-feira, 16 de maio de 2017 06:50:18 PDT Jason H wrote: > I also wonder about the SQL bound parameter interface? That formatting is a > mash of :? or :name or something else (":1"?). I think for consistency, > that should be able to use whatever the rest of the toolkit does too. Choose one

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 beta4 available

Thanks for the report. I'll take a look at finishing this tonight. -- Robin Burchell ro...@crimson.no On Tue, May 16, 2017, at 06:43 PM, Тимур Артиков wrote: > Hi, > I believe, QTBUG-60547 should be fixed before the release. > ___ > Development

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 beta4 available

Hi, I believe, QTBUG-60547 should be fixed before the release. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Introducing discussion about QStringFormatter

> On 15 May 2017, at 15:16, Marc Mutz wrote: > > Open For Extension - Users can add formatting for their own types (like > QStringBuilder allows, but using documented API). QDateTime, etc support to > be added as examples. We’ve been writing QDebug operator<<(QDebug

Re: [Development] Introducing discussion about QStringFormatter

On Mon, May 15, 2017, at 02:49 PM, Mårten Nordheim wrote: > 3. What are its soft requirements? One very low priority item floating around on my wishlist would be formatting for QByteArray as well, though this is of course a bit of a task. But it would be useful for cases when you want to avoid

Re: [Development] Introducing discussion about QStringFormatter

I'm not saying one or the other, python supports both, I'm saying let the developer choose. If positions change, but arg order doesn't, then by all means you must use numbered args. But if the developer doesn't need that then don't make the developer have to maintain it. "Code less. Create

Re: [Development] List of available Qt mirrors

hi, I got 4 mirrors from the link from China mainland, http://mirrors.ustc.edu.cn/qtproject/online/qtsdkrepository/windows_x86/root/qt/Updates.xml (cn, prio 100) http://mirrors.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn/qt/online/qtsdkrepository/windows_x86/root/qt/Updates.xml (cn, prio 100)

[Development] Dropping the option to disable QStringBuilder in 5.10?

Hi, I'd like to suggest to drop the option to disable QStringBuilder-backed op+ in Qt 5.10. We have been compiling Qt itself with QStringBuilder-backed op+ and have seen very little breakages (mainly in qmake, with its own string type). The reason to drop it is that QStringBuilder is a lot

[Development] Qt 5.9 beta4 available

Hi all, Qt 5.9 beta4 is now available. Instructions how to get the release are here: https://wiki.qt.io/How_to_get_snapshot_via_online_installer. Diff to beta3 can be found as an attachment. Please test the release and report your effort via https://wiki.qt.io/Qt59_release_testing. Beta4

[Development] [Announce] Qt 5.9 beta4 available

Hi all, Qt 5.9 beta4 is available. As earlier you can update it at the top of your Qt 5.9 beta(3) online installation or do clean installation by using qt online installer. Detailed instructions here: https://wiki.qt.io/How_to_get_snapshot_via_online_installer Beta4 should be last beta

Re: [Development] Introducing discussion about QStringFormatter

> On May 16, 2017, at 10:12 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote: > > Jason H (15 May 2017 23:52): >> Having worked with Python's format(), I much prefer the alterative {} >> syntax, where {} defers to the next paramter. >> '{}{}{}'.format('a', 'b', 'c) == 'abc' >> Which makes

Re: [Development] Introducing discussion about QStringFormatter

Jason H (15 May 2017 23:52): > Having worked with Python's format(), I much prefer the alterative {} > syntax, where {} defers to the next paramter. > '{}{}{}'.format('a', 'b', 'c) == 'abc' > Which makes maintence much easier, However, it can be problematic for translation; some languages shall

Re: [Development] Calls for Presentations open for Qt World Summit 2017 and Meeting C++

Thanks Milian, Looks like by default the option for multiple responses is turned off. Reading the manual helped, it should now be turned on. If it still doesn't work ping me directly. Best, Tero > -Original Message- > From: milian On Behalf Of Milian Wolff > Sent: 15 May 2017 15:59 >