Re: [Development] Maintainers, your action needed: Qt 5.11.1 changes files

2018-06-11 Thread EXT Jani Heikkinen
Hi, Really many changes file without approval. Please finalize these now to make sure we can do the release as planned br, Jani From: Jani Heikkinen Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 11:54 AM To: development@qt-project.org Cc: releas...@qt-project.org Subject: M

Re: [Development] Did we have to remove cmake's qt5_use_modules?

2018-06-11 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El viernes, 8 de junio de 2018 11:59:10 -03 Kevin Funk escribió: [snip] > Heya Thiago, > > thanks for bringing this up on the mailing list. I have authored the patch > which (also) removed qt5_use_modules(). To my excuse, I haven't expected > that so many projects still use said macro actively. I

Re: [Development] QtCS 2018 - Serialisation session notes

2018-06-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 11 June 2018 22:50:09 CEST Rafael Roquetto wrote: > Would it also make sense to explore msgpack? https://msgpack.org/ No. Msgpack is the older version of CBOR, which we already have. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technolo

Re: [Development] QtCS 2018 - Serialisation session notes

2018-06-11 Thread Rafael Roquetto
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:39:07PM +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday, 11 June 2018 13:23:21 CEST Liang Qi wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 13:17, Thiago Macieira > > > > wrote: > > > Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation > > > > > > === Protobuf === > > > > > > * Need volunte

[Development] QtCS 2018 - Date/time session

2018-06-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Date_Time Howard Hinnant's new civil calendar and timezone proposals have made it to the C++ 20 draft (N4750) * Not implemented yet in any C++ Standard Library === Time Zone === * Why would we use this, if we have to keep our existing code? ** Allows us to hook

[Development] Qt 5.9.6 and Qt Creator 4.6.2 released

2018-06-11 Thread EXT Jani Heikkinen
Hi, We have released Qt 5.9.6 and Qt Creator 4.6.2 today. Please read blog posts to get more information: http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/06/11/qt-5-9-6-released/ and http://blog.qt.io/blog/2018/06/11/qt-creator-4-6-2-released/ Thanks to everyone involved! br, Jani Heikkinen Release Manager _

Re: [Development] QtCS 2018 - Serialisation session notes

2018-06-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 11 June 2018 13:23:21 CEST Liang Qi wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 13:17, Thiago Macieira > > wrote: > > Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation > > > > === Protobuf === > > > > * Need volunteers to write a Proof of Concept > > ** plugin to protoc? > > > > About protobuf su

Re: [Development] QtCS 2018 - Serialisation session notes

2018-06-11 Thread Liang Qi
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 at 13:17, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation > > === Protobuf === > > * Need volunteers to write a Proof of Concept > ** plugin to protoc? > > About protobuf support in Qt, I have an old WIP change at https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/

Re: [Development] QtCS 2018: Third-party and security policy

2018-06-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 11 June 2018 10:56:42 CEST EXT Eike Ziller wrote: > If we are about to release Qt Creator with LLVM/Clang 6.0, and LLVM/Clang > 6.1 is released, this has good chances to introduce bugs. Aside from that, > updating the binaries that we ship is an effort, since they are profile > optimized

[Development] QtCS 2018 - Serialisation session notes

2018-06-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
Link: https://wiki.qt.io/QtCS2018_Serialisation === Binary JSON === * Was created for qtjsondb * fast reading * mmap()able * Deprecate soon (Qt 5.12?) ** Remove from QJsonDocument in Qt 6 ** Provide compat API to read *** BSJON → JSON → parse again === QJsonDocument === * Limited to 128 MB of R

Re: [Development] QtCS 2018: Third-party and security policy

2018-06-11 Thread EXT Eike Ziller
> On 10. Jun 2018, at 22:48, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Sunday, 10 June 2018 18:17:31 IST Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: >>> 0) Where not really necessary, delete the third-party code and force the >>> use of a system library (see assimp discussion, can be applied to >>> qtimageformats too). >> >

Re: [Development] Is Qt for Automation available under GPLv3?

2018-06-11 Thread EXT Alex Blasche
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+alexander.blasche=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Sze Howe Koh > On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 at 14:52, Frank Meerkötter > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to point out that Qt OPC UA, which is part of Qt for > > Automati