Re: [Development] Nominating Miguel Costa for Approver

2018-07-29 Thread Joerg Bornemann
On 07/25/2018 05:12 PM, Alex Blasche wrote: I'd like to nominate Miguel for approver rights. +1 Disclaimer: He's sitting next to Oliver. Joerg ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Development] LLVM and Qt

2018-07-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday, 29 July 2018 13:36:43 PDT Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > It would also be pretty nice to know if there is a policy with respect the > llvm supported version. As they do not keep ABI compatibility distros > normally are forced to ship from two to three versions. As I unders

Re: [Development] Raising the minimum Android NDK version

2018-07-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday, 29 July 2018 12:18:38 PDT BogDan Vatra via Development wrote: > For 5.11 we used 10e and I'm afraid we can't afford to change it without > proper testing. Thanks. Someone can fix the issue then. I recommend #ifdef Q_OS_ANDROID // Android libc told us for 7 years to use a file Android

Re: [Development] LLVM and Qt

2018-07-29 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El domingo, 29 de julio de 2018 17:40:04 -03 Allan Sandfeld Jensen escribió: [snip] Wow, that was fast for a sunday :-) Thanks! > You only need llvm for qdoc. You can probably remove qdoc on those > platforms, and generate the platform independent documentation packages on > hosts where it is sup

Re: [Development] LLVM and Qt

2018-07-29 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Sonntag, 29. Juli 2018 22:36:43 CEST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Hi! As now qdoc has gained a dependency on llvm we noted that many Debian > ports will not be able to build it anymore, as llvm has (at least for now) > no support for them: > >

[Development] LLVM and Qt

2018-07-29 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi! As now qdoc has gained a dependency on llvm we noted that many Debian ports will not be able to build it anymore, as llvm has (at least for now) no support for them: I would like to know if there is any other plac

Re: [Development] Raising the minimum Android NDK version

2018-07-29 Thread BogDan Vatra via Development
For 5.11 we used 10e and I'm afraid we can't afford to change it without proper testing. Cheers, BogDan. On July 29, 2018 10:11:53 PM GMT+03:00, Thiago Macieira wrote: >On Sunday, 29 July 2018 11:15:38 PDT BogDan Vatra via Development >wrote: >> AFIK qt 5.12 will use ndk r16 or better. > >The

Re: [Development] Raising the minimum Android NDK version

2018-07-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Sunday, 29 July 2018 11:15:38 PDT BogDan Vatra via Development wrote: > AFIK qt 5.12 will use ndk r16 or better. The question was for Qt 5.11 using fixed headers. The fix in Bionic happened in January 2015. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open

Re: [Development] Raising the minimum Android NDK version

2018-07-29 Thread BogDan Vatra via Development
AFIK qt 5.12 will use ndk r16 or better. On July 29, 2018 6:16:30 PM GMT+03:00, Thiago Macieira wrote: >On Monday, 16 July 2018 08:50:05 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On Monday, 16 July 2018 00:08:44 PDT Bogdan Vatra via Development >wrote: >> > The clang support was added and works fine from 5.

Re: [Development] Raising the minimum Android NDK version

2018-07-29 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday, 16 July 2018 08:50:05 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday, 16 July 2018 00:08:44 PDT Bogdan Vatra via Development wrote: > > The clang support was added and works fine from 5.9. But I think is too > > late to switch NDK for 5.11. > > I'm not asking to change compilers. I am asking wh