Re: [Development] Qt 5.12 feature freeze is getting closer

2018-07-30 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi all, Kindly reminder: Feature freeze will be in effect after 3 weeks (20.8.2018). So please make sure all new features for Qt 5.12 are ready and in 'dev' early enough. And please notify me if there will be any new or any removed submodules for Qt5; at the moment i don't know any changes

Re: [Development] Qt 6 buildsystem support requirements

2018-07-30 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2018-07-21 19:52, Jason Newton wrote: > I wanted to mention that this is on my mind alot for a few years days > as a user for a plethora of libraries. My conclusion for the build > system with the brightest future is bazel [...] No. Just, *no*. Persistent build server? Java? No, thanks.

Re: [Development] Proposing Samuel Gaist for approver status

2018-07-30 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
+1 28.07.2018, 11:56, "André" : > Hello all, > > I'd like to propose Samuel as approver. He has been active in the Qt project > for ages. > > He not only provides code changes [0], he is also active reviewing others > changes [1]. > > But that's not all: Samuel is *extremly* active in the Qt

Re: [Development] Proposing Samuel Gaist for approver status

2018-07-30 Thread Gabriel de Dietrich
+1 Best regards, Dr. Gabriel de Dietrich Senior Software Developer The Qt Company On Jul 28, 2018, at 1:56 AM, André mailto:aha_1...@gmx.de>> wrote: Hello all, I'd like to propose Samuel as approver. He has been active in the Qt project for ages. He not only provides code changes [0], he

Re: [Development] Proposing Samuel Gaist for approver status

2018-07-30 Thread Robert Löhning
Am 28.07.2018 um 10:56 schrieb André: Hello all, I'd like to propose Samuel as approver. He has been active in the Qt project for ages. He not only provides code changes [0], he is also active reviewing others changes [1]. But that's not all: Samuel is *extremly* active in the Qt Forum [2],

Re: [Development] Proposing Samuel Gaist for approver status

2018-07-30 Thread Shawn Rutledge
+1 > On 28 Jul 2018, at 10:56, André wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'd like to propose Samuel as approver. He has been active in the Qt project > for ages. > > He not only provides code changes [0], he is also active reviewing others > changes [1]. > > But that's not all: Samuel is *extremly*

Re: [Development] Proposing Samuel Gaist for approver status

2018-07-30 Thread Edward Welbourne
On Saturday, 28 July 2018 01:56:37 PDT André wrote: >> I'd like to propose Samuel as approver. He has been active in the Qt project >> for ages. >> >> He not only provides code changes [0], he is also active reviewing others >> changes [1]. >> >> But that's not all: Samuel is *extremly* active in

Re: [Development] Nominating Miguel Costa for Approver

2018-07-30 Thread Joerg Bornemann
On 07/25/2018 05:12 PM, Alex Blasche wrote: I'd like to nominate Miguel for approver rights. +1 Disclaimer: He's sitting next to Oliver. Joerg ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org