Re: [Development] Requesting a repository for Lottie-Qt implementation

Hi, Thanks for pointing out that this alternative implementation exists. On onsdag 9. januar 2019 17:18:50 CET Eike Hein wrote: > Hi, > > we've written one of those at KDE recently: > > https://github.com/kbroulik/lottie-qml > > We also submitted some patches to both Qt and Lottie to make it

Re: [Development] Requesting a repository for Lottie-Qt implementation

Hi Eike, Great, the more the merrier. After we have the repo in place, I hope you can also take a look into what we have in mind as approach for the player. Maybe one day these can be compared, perhaps combined or otherwise unified. Yours, Tuukka On 09/01/2019, 19.31,

Re: [Development] Requesting a repository for Lottie-Qt implementation

Hi Thiago, Lottie is the established term for a player of animations created with Adobe After Effects and exported with a plugin tool called Bodymovin. Lottie is a registered trademark for many things (like nail polish, children's toys and food), but it is not registered as a trademark for

Re: [Development] Coding style for lambdas with empty parameter list

I like the shorter form, but keep in mind that when the return type needs to be specified, [] ->foo { // lambda content } is not possible, and following is needed: []() -> foo { // lambda content } Philippe On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 19:08:46 +0100 "André Hartmann" wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently

[Development] Coding style for lambdas with empty parameter list

Hi all, I recently found an inconsistency regarding empty lambda parameter lists between [1] and [2]. While the first states, that parentheses have to be written always, the latter is missing this section. My request to syncronize both [3] lead to the conclusion, to change the rule, so that

Re: [Development] Requesting a repository for Lottie-Qt implementation

On Wednesday, 9 January 2019 06:23:02 PST Tuukka Turunen wrote: > Description: Lottie-Qt, a renderer for Bodymovin animations What's "Lottie" ? Is that an acronym? Or is it a trademark of something? If it's the latter, please find another name. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT)

Re: [Development] Requesting a repository for Lottie-Qt implementation

Hi, we've written one of those at KDE recently: https://github.com/kbroulik/lottie-qml We also submitted some patches to both Qt and Lottie to make it work better. Ours is LGPLv2+ as usual, FWIW. Cheers, Eike On 1/9/19 11:23 PM, Tuukka Turunen wrote: >   > > Hi, > >   > > I would like

Re: [Development] QAbstractVideoFilter, the pipeline and QImage

>> I really want a QAbstractVideoBuffer *QVideoFrame::buffer() which I can then >>cast to my custom type.   > Sorry, but just a note. > QAbstractVideoBuffer is an abstraction that was supposed to be an impl of > accessing to data, nothing more.     >> I'm trying to implement a QAbstractVideo

[Development] Requesting a repository for Lottie-Qt implementation

Hi, I would like to request for a new repository: Name of the repository: qt/qtlottie.git Description: Lottie-Qt, a renderer for Bodymovin animations Responsible person: Eirik Aavitsland Gerrit user/email: eirik.aavitsl...@qt.io Lottie is a family of player

Re: [Development] Corrupted ML archive

Thanks! Am 09.01.19 um 11:25 schrieb Edward Welbourne: André Hartmann (8 January 2019 14:09) wrote: The Qt Creator archive seems broken too. https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator/2019-January/thread.html only contains two mails, but I'm pretty sure there has been more. Same as

Re: [Development] Corrupted ML archive

André Hartmann (8 January 2019 14:09) wrote: > The Qt Creator archive seems broken too. > > https://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator/2019-January/thread.html > only contains two mails, but I'm pretty sure there has been more. Same as developer. I've poked the sysadmins again ...

Re: [Development] [Releasing] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.12' to '5.12.1' started

qtbase and qttools final down merges are done, https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/249324/ https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/249362/ And also qt5 5.12->5.12.1 final down merge is done, https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/249362/ —Liang > On 8 Jan 2019, at 08:32, Jani Heikkinen wrote:

Re: [Development] QAbstractVideoFilter, the pipeline and QImage

Hi, > I really want a QAbstractVideoBuffer *QVideoFrame::buffer() which I can then > cast to my custom type. Sorry, but just a note. QAbstractVideoBuffer is an abstraction that was supposed to be an impl of accessing to data, nothing more. > I'm trying to implement a QAbstractVideo buffer

[Development] Qt Automotive Suite 5.12.0 released

Hi everyone! I am happy to announce that Qt Automotive Suite 5.12.0 has been released. Read more information from the blog post: https://blog.qt.io/blog/2019/01/09/announcing-qt-automotive-suite-5-12/ Big thanks to everyone involved! br, Jukka Jokiniva Release Manager The Qt Company