Am 05.03.2019 um 11:53 schrieb Tor Arne Vestbø:
On 5 Mar 2019, at 11:27, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
wrote:
Il 05/03/19 08:14, Lars Knoll ha scritto:
One solution I thought about is to replace the QT_DEPRECATED(_X) macros with
something that also contains the version (similar to
On Tuesday, 5 March 2019 06:52:27 PST Gatis Paeglis wrote:
> "This library is present on all supported platforms."
Please note the implication on this: the Linux distribution you're using is
NOT a supported one.
The commit removing xkbcommon explicitly says so:
> library doesn't provide another way to build itself.
libxkbcommon changelog for 0.7.2
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2017-August/034721.html
"Added a Meson build system as an alternative to existing autotools build
system. The intent is to remove the autotools build in
- [QTBUG-65503] Removed xkbcommon from bundled sources. This library is
present on all supported platforms. The minimal required version now is
0.5.0.
The change above makes updating Qt a gargantuan task for Centos 6 at least.
Building xkbcommon there requires meson (which centos 6
> On 5 Mar 2019, at 11:27, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
> wrote:
>
> Il 05/03/19 08:14, Lars Knoll ha scritto:
>> One solution I thought about is to replace the QT_DEPRECATED(_X) macros with
>> something that also contains the version (similar to QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE).
>> Then the user
Il 05/03/19 08:14, Lars Knoll ha scritto:
One solution I thought about is to replace the QT_DEPRECATED(_X) macros
with something that also contains the version (similar to
QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE). Then the user could define how current he wants to
be, and we could set a reasonable default going
On Tuesday, March 5, 2019 8:14:00 AM CET Lars Knoll wrote:
> One solution I thought about is to replace the QT_DEPRECATED(_X) macros with
> something that also contains the version (similar to QT_DEPRECATED_SINCE).
> Then the user could define how current he wants to be, and we could set a
>
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 22:27:42 +0100
André Pönitz wrote:
> (5) Use #if (QT_VERSION / QT_VERSION_CHECK. To "fix" perfectly
> valid code *for cosmetical reasons*? DUH!
Example: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/252715/1 was necessary because
of the immediate deprecation of an existing function
> On 4. Mar 2019, at 22:27, André Pönitz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 05:51:08PM +0100, Christian Ehrlicher wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently introduced some new signals
>> (Q(Double)SpinBox::textChanged, QComboBox::textActivated) as
>> replacements for old ones to be able to avoid the use
