On 4/14/19 10:01 PM, Martin Koller wrote:
> I have updated https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/177571/
> but Qt Sanity Bot does not check it.
> Why ?
> I have now a +2 from Bogdan but can not merge.
The bot seems to be back again, and the change is merged.
Note that you can manually assign a
What do people think about providing official static packages?
The reason is that the distribution of an application is much easier in a
single executable. For that reasons I've made many static qt builds and
it's always a lot of work to make it running.
I have success in building qt statically
Hi,
I have updated https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/177571/
but Qt Sanity Bot does not check it.
Why ?
I have now a +2 from Bogdan but can not merge.
--
Best regards/Schöne Grüße
Martin
A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q: Why is top posting bad?
() ascii ribbon
