On Monday, 13 May 2019 07:28:55 PDT Edward Welbourne wrote:
>> Does anyone know why androiddeployqt links against the boot-strap
>> library ? i.e. Is there any good reason not to change it to link
>> against libQt5Core instead ?
Thiago Macieira (13 May 2019 17:08) replied:
> androiddeployqt is a
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:53:42PM +0300, Konstantin Shegunov wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:42 PM Konstantin Ritt wrote:
>
> > Writing and proposing a patch would take less time than discussing pros
> > and cons here.
>
> Which I had in a minute fraction done, as a pass-by in the comments.
On Monday, 13 May 2019 07:28:55 PDT Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Does anyone know why androiddeployqt links against the boot-strap
> library ? i.e. Is there any good reason not to change it to link
> against libQt5Core instead ?
androiddeployqt is a host tool. You don't run it on-device, but on the
Hi all,
In an attempt to deprecate [0] use of QTime as a timer (in favour of
QElapsedTimer, which does the job properly) I've tripped over the fact
that androiddeployqt links against the boot-strap library rather than
libQt5Core. The former lacks QElapsedTimer, so I can't move ahead with
the depr
Hi Frederik,
Yes, the module was already created.
So the patch in qt/qt5 is 5.14 should be the only thing missing.
Yes, I think it is an addon.
Best Regards,
Thomas Hartmann
From: Frederik Gladhorn
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2019 1:03:53 PM
To: development@qt-pro
Hi Thomas,
Since the module exists, it's a bit unclear to me what you request (creating
the module would what I'd expect).
The next step would be to ask for inclusion in the releases and making a patch
to qt/qt5 to enable us shipping the module by default.
Then there's the question which state
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:42 PM Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> Writing and proposing a patch would take less time than discussing pros
> and cons here.
>
Which I had in a minute fraction done, as a pass-by in the comments. I'm
not, however, willing to take huge technical debt on the issue by investin
Writing and proposing a patch would take less time than discussing pros and
cons here.
Konstantin
пн, 13 мая 2019 г., 12:31 Konstantin Shegunov :
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:42 AM Christian Gagneraud
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 07:47, Konstantin Shegunov
>> wrote:
>> > Doesn't this i
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:42 AM Christian Gagneraud
wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 07:47, Konstantin Shegunov
> wrote:
> > Doesn't this imply it should be dropped as an API that we can rely on?
>
> No i don't think so, this is just an edge case. I solved it by
> changing the base unit of my gra
