> > Suggestions:
> > pack, wad (another indirect Doom reference), bale, herd, doss,
> > transfigure (probably too long)
>
> I cannot resist to suggest QTransmogrifier [1]
> Seriously, QBind is akin to GUI data binding and SQL parameter binding but
> more specialized so I would just pick a
-Original Message-
From: Jason H
> > My only remaining comment is QBind is rather ambiguous.
> > We already have "bind" used as for SQL parameters. Bind is also used for IP
> > ports, Boost uses "bind" for connections. "Data binding" is another thing
> > as well usually to bind data to
> My only remaining comment is QBind is rather ambiguous.
> We already have "bind" used as for SQL parameters. Bind is also used for IP
> ports, Boost uses "bind" for connections. "Data binding" is another thing as
> well usually to bind data to UI elements.
>
> Could it be called something
My only remaining comment is QBind is rather ambiguous.
We already have "bind" used as for SQL parameters. Bind is also used for IP
ports, Boost uses "bind" for connections. "Data binding" is another thing as
well usually to bind data to UI elements.
Could it be called something else?
> On 3 Sep 2019, at 09:12, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 3 September 2019 07:53:29 CEST Liang Qi wrote:
>> It happened so fast this time.
>>
>> But 5.12.5 was branched out before this cherry-pick mode change on 5.12
>> branch, I plan to do the 5.12.5->5.12->5.13 merges after
On Tuesday, 3 September 2019 07:53:29 CEST Liang Qi wrote:
> It happened so fast this time.
>
> But 5.12.5 was branched out before this cherry-pick mode change on 5.12
> branch, I plan to do the 5.12.5->5.12->5.13 merges after 5.12.5 is out. Is
> it OK?
That sounds good. Otherwise we might need
