On Wednesday, 1 July 2020 14:21:33 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Re: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-84739
> Summary: Qt 5.15 has an unintentional change in behaviour that has broken
> existing applications. We need to decide whether to:
> b) revert permanently
Looks like the discussion has
Hi Bruno!
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 15:11, Bruno Crocamo wrote:
>
> Thank u, Eddy.
>
> Lars, in my first message I mentioned a link:
> https://github.com/wkhtmltopdf/qt/pull/47.
>
> Here you can see the changes I made:
> https://github.com/wkhtmltopdf/qt/pull/47/commits/5d639d9c04dbc644875e913cf0a6
Thank u, Eddy.
Lars, in my first message I mentioned a link:
https://github.com/wkhtmltopdf/qt/pull/47.
Here you can see the changes I made:
https://github.com/wkhtmltopdf/qt/pull/47/commits/5d639d9c04dbc644875e913cf0a6f5f54abcbf75
The changes made by me perform a reordering. This lessens the ri
On Thursday, 9 July 2020 03:48:18 PDT Lars Knoll wrote:
> The easiest fix for this would probably be to simply change the "QList
> glyph_indices;" in QFontSubset to a QSet.
That would make the output non-deterministic. If determinism is wanted, a
sorted container is preferable.
--
Thiago Macie
> On 8 Jul 2020, at 19:02, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 8 July 2020 09:44:33 PDT Bruno Crocamo wrote:
>> An organization may need to remove sensitive information from a PDF
>> document to share an ostentatious version. Adobe software is one way to do
>> this. However, depending on th
Hi Bruno,
In addition to what Thiago said, about contributing in general, for
future reference, The Qt Project does also have a security policy [1],
which outlines the process for handling vulnerabilities. Given that
this discussion has happened in public already, the confidentiality
aspects of t
