> Right. That will become an issue in 4 months when GCC 11 ships with its
> internal
> header-dependency refactorings, breaking all sorts of Qt code, and
> that will then
> bubble down to various distro downstreams during this year and next. Then
> again,
> distro packagers can hopefully handle t
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 22:22, Max Paperno wrote:
> I'm so sick of "scheduled releases come hell or high water" in the
> programming world (in general, not just Qt). The quality is (usually)
> crap. Once upon a time this release quality was called
> Alpha/Beta/Preview/NFP (not for production). Qt
On 1/5/2021 1:02 PM, Adam Light wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 7:56 AM Volker Hilsheimer
mailto:volker.hilshei...@qt.io>> wrote:
Apart from that: is Qt 5.15.2 really so broken that people can’t use
it without getting more patches?
I can't speak to 5.15 as we decided not to upgrade s
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 21:42, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > 2) support for newer compilers/OS versions/etc. that may cause trouble.
> Currently a non-issue, since Qt 5.15 is less than a year old. It may become an
> issue in two or three years' time, but hopefully by then the Qt 6.x content
> set will
On Tuesday, 5 January 2021 15:06:05 -03 Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development
wrote:
> Il 05/01/21 16:55, Volker Hilsheimer ha scritto:
> > Apart from that: is Qt 5.15.2 really so broken that people can’t use it
> > without getting more patches?
> Apart from bugs, there's still the issue of
>
> 1) 3r
Il 05/01/21 16:55, Volker Hilsheimer ha scritto:
Apart from that: is Qt 5.15.2 really so broken that people can’t use it without
getting more patches?
Apart from bugs, there's still the issue of
1) 3rd parties not getting updated for security bugs
2) support for newer compilers/OS versions/et
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 7:56 AM Volker Hilsheimer
wrote:
> Apart from that: is Qt 5.15.2 really so broken that people can’t use it
> without getting more patches?
>
>
I can't speak to 5.15 as we decided not to upgrade since it's not a real
LTS release (we do not believe we are eligible to purchase
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 16:55, Volker Hilsheimer
wrote:
>
> Apart from that: is Qt 5.15.2 really so broken that people can’t use it
> without getting more patches?
>
A quick search in Jira gives already 11 "P1: Critical" bugs with Fix
Version 5.15.3.
With 5 issues about crashes, 1 memory leak and
> On 5 Jan 2021, at 16:23, Scott Bloom wrote:
>
> On Monday, 4 January 2021 20:32:27 -03 Scott Bloom wrote:
>>> The funny thing, I remember at a Qt Dev Days when Qt 5 was about a
>>> year away. The "we will never do a Qt 3-4 type major version change
>>> again" was said time and time again.
>>
On Monday, 4 January 2021 20:32:27 -03 Scott Bloom wrote:
> The funny thing, I remember at a Qt Dev Days when Qt 5 was about a
> year away. The "we will never do a Qt 3-4 type major version change
> again" was said time and time again.
>
> Where functionality was missing, and no one was happy w
I just wrote:
> let's create a ticket in Jira and sketch out what we can do.
and I now see you've filed that ticket while I was writing, QTBUG-89824,
so let's take any further discussion there,
Eddy.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-p
Wang Gary (25 December 2020 17:40) wrote:
> Hello,
Hello Gary, likewise.
As Thiago already said, you came to the right place,
albeit while many of us were on vacation.
> The first issue is, in order to get QCalendar support a new calendar
> system, it seems like I need to subclass QCalendarBacken
Hi
Disk quota got exceeded and I’m trying to fix it somehow. CI is at a stand
still until I fix it.
-Tony
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
13 matches
Mail list logo
