Re: [Development] Qt 6 co-installability with Qt 5

2021-02-16 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi Kai. On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 10:34, Kai Köhne wrote: [snip] > To be honest, the whole discussion feels to me that we are being held hostage > right now for the fraction of Linux users that cannot use update-alternatives > (because they are not administrators). If having different names of

Re: [Development] Qt 6 co-installability with Qt 5

2021-02-16 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi! On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 11:37, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 15:35, Kai Köhne wrote: > > And again, this is not something limited to Qt. Last time I checked, the > > executable to run Python 3 on Windows is python.exe, not python3.exe. On > > Debian at least it's

Re: [Development] Qt 6 co-installability with Qt 5

2021-02-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 16 February 2021 05:31:17 PST Kai Köhne wrote: > Well, let's just realize that, by renaming qmake to qmake6 everywhere > (including in the documentation), we actually create some confusion for our > existing users, too. Also, I think adding version numbers to the name of > tools is

Re: [Development] Qt 6 co-installability with Qt 5

2021-02-16 Thread André Pönitz
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 04:35:25PM +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 15:35, Kai Köhne wrote: > > And again, this is not something limited to Qt. Last time I checked, > > the executable to run Python 3 on Windows is python.exe, not > > python3.exe. On Debian at least it's

Re: [Development] Qt 6 co-installability with Qt 5

2021-02-16 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 15:35, Kai Köhne wrote: > And again, this is not something limited to Qt. Last time I checked, the > executable to run Python 3 on Windows is python.exe, not python3.exe. On > Debian at least it's python3. This hasn't blocked Python from being perceived > as overall

Re: [Development] Qt 6 co-installability with Qt 5

2021-02-16 Thread Shawn Rutledge
> On 2021 Feb 16, at 14:31, Kai Köhne wrote: > > Well, let's just realize that, by renaming qmake to qmake6 everywhere > (including in the documentation), we actually create some confusion for our > existing users, too. Also, I think adding version numbers to the name of > tools is just no

Re: [Development] Qt 6 co-installability with Qt 5

2021-02-16 Thread Tor Arne Vestbø
> On 16 Feb 2021, at 14:31, Kai Köhne wrote: > > Well, let's just realize that, by renaming qmake to qmake6 everywhere > (including in the documentation), we actually create some confusion for our > existing users, too. Also, I think adding version numbers to the name of > tools is just no

Re: [Development] Qt 6 co-installability with Qt 5

2021-02-16 Thread Kai Köhne
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Development Im Auftrag von > Jyrki Yli-Nokari > Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2021 06:10 > An: development@qt-project.org > Betreff: Re: [Development] Qt 6 co-installability with Qt 5 > > Thiago is right. Qt’s biggest problem is the barrier of entry.

[Development] Qt 6.1 Alpha released

2021-02-16 Thread Jani Heikkinen
Hi all, We have released Qt 6.1 Alpha today, see https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-6.1-alpha-released Thanks to everyone involved! br, Jani Heikkinen Release Manager ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org